Leave a comment

Comments 14

lazerbug May 29 2006, 15:14:50 UTC
agreed. my huge geek of a boyfriend made me see it with him, and when the movie ended, i walked out nonplussed. definitely not the best movie i've seen.

Reply

theskooch May 29 2006, 16:41:58 UTC
But did you stay 'til the credits were over? :O

Reply

lazerbug May 29 2006, 19:27:33 UTC
no, was i supposed to? was there something that made the movie have a better storyline after the credits?

Reply

theskooch May 29 2006, 20:01:10 UTC
I wouldn't go that far.

Reply


andythesaint May 29 2006, 16:53:04 UTC
Wow, you beat me to a review. Probably because it's too painful for me.

Reply


cryingdrunkgirl May 29 2006, 17:01:42 UTC
The Golden Gate things was comepletely pointless.

I was really looking point to Angel and I figured they would have good stuff for him because they got Ben Foster, but him flying out of that building was the only cool thing about him.

I didn't hate it as much as you, but I was kind of depressed after it was over.

On the plus side-Halle Berry didn't suck as much as she did in the other ones....

Reply

mustbebunnies88 May 30 2006, 01:33:43 UTC
Every time I watch the first "X-Men" film, I repeat to myself: Oscar winner Halle Berry. And then I laugh. And then cry. Johnny Depp and Martin Scorsese have zero Oscars; little miss "hey, where'd my accent go?" has one.

Reply


vocabulate May 29 2006, 21:07:45 UTC
I wonder why after so much work was put into Rogue's character she was completely left out of this one? Completely.

But then I didn't go into this one expecting anything breathtaking. (It was in a way though - sucked all of the air out of the theatre...)

Reply

theskooch May 29 2006, 21:50:15 UTC
Rogue's character was very much dependant on the previous two movies. After everything she went through in those two, could you really blame her for taking the easy way out? Sure, that might make for an interesting story, but that's not what this movie was about.

Reply

oyaguy May 30 2006, 04:39:27 UTC
I don't think her decision was really that surprising, but then again, something that insanely important was thrown out there and then completely ignored. This film kept doing that too. Throwing out some very interesting ideas, and then ignoring them.

When the President mentions how can a democracy function when single citzens can move cities with there minds, was a really good point in favour of "the cure." Then it's ignored again. This movie constantly threw out these ideas and ignored them.

Reply


mm511 May 30 2006, 06:53:51 UTC
I loved the fact that, though they KNEW Magneto would come after Mystique, they didn't bother engineering all-plastic trucks or all-plastic prisons... although they DID learn by the time they created their guns...

You can see my own LENGTHY review for what I thought of the rest of the movie. :-)

Reply

oyaguy May 30 2006, 07:03:03 UTC
See, that would be Stupid People Syndrome at work. Though to be fair can anything operating at the mechanical stresses of a moving vehicle be made without using ANY metal at all?

Even then, there is so much metal out there that Magneto could use other metal to bash his way through the convoy.

Reply

mm511 May 30 2006, 07:14:42 UTC
If they can engineer plastic guns and a plastic prison (X2, I think) I imagine they could have handled automotives. And plus, stop thinking! Heh. This is an action movie set in an imaginary, alternate universe: of course they could have handled it. But it would have been more difficult, I guess, for the 0.2 seconds allotted in the movie for the "Magneto frees Mystique, then abandons her, so we can have the later scene in which the mutants outsmart the humans yet again, because really, humans are really dumb" scene.

*shrugs*

I had such high hopes for this damn movie...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up