I didn't get a chance to complete this post before HR 3590 was signed by the President today. Some of what I say here is no longer true as a result of the bill (and some of it still is), but I thought I should post this anyway to show where we came from.
If someone buys a car or house they can't afford you can reposess that car or house.
Not so
(
Read more... )
Comments 10
If you can handle their rigidity, the Swiss aren't bad to work for. I love their country. I love their machine guns. I might emigrate someday :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I get paid for about 70% of the E+M I do, and I ostensibly only see patients whose insurances I'm contracted with. Sounds fishy, doesn't it?
Reply
One thing I want to amplify from your above points: not only does an unconscious or disoriented person lack the ability to accept medical care, they also lack the ability to *reject* care that they are unable to pay for. If you don't have (non-liability) auto insurance and you get into an accident, the worst case is that you get stuck with no car. Because of the obligation to treat, if you don't have health insurance, you may end up stuck with debt that you could've rejected had you been able to respond rationally.
Reply
On Monday, I heard the president of the AMA address an audience of health care researchers about health care reform and then the director of the AHRQ talk about current and future health care research priorities. It was so refreshing to be in a crowd of people for whom everything you've written is so familiar as to be nearly axiomatic. And when you discuss health care reform with people who are actually engaged in the delivery of health care and its improvement (I do not count medical insurance companies or their shareholders in that group), the obvious wisdom and practical necessity of these reforms is a foregone conclusion.
Will post more on this observations later, but just wanted to chime in for now.
Reply
Leave a comment