So I was reading
Federalist 41 and there's a sentence that I do not fully understand:
A power to destroy the freedom of the press, the trial by jury, or even to regulate the course of descents, or the forms of conveyances, must be very singularly expressed by the terms "to raise money for the general welfare."I think I understand the general jist
(
Read more... )
Comments 10
Reply
Reply
I called it sarcasm before, but "very singularly expressed" is perhaps better described as arch.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
It's all about property. They were very big on property back then.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment