Reading the legal instructions was mostly me btw, which actually changed my mind from "guilty" to "not". My minimal legal experiance apparently showed, and someone asked about it.
The jury as a whole was pretty contemptious of the defense and prosecutor both (obvious flaws in presentation, missing data that the jury would like to have seen), and of the defendant. We all "knew" that he would likely do it again, which made the not guilty pretty hard to swallow for some.
Comments 2
(The comment has been removed)
The jury as a whole was pretty contemptious of the defense and prosecutor both (obvious flaws in presentation, missing data that the jury would like to have seen), and of the defendant. We all "knew" that he would likely do it again, which made the not guilty pretty hard to swallow for some.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
So he is "not guilty" in the legal sense, and got to walk free. Well, hobble. The greater good of preserving the legal system was upheld.
Reply
Leave a comment