A few moments ago I left a couple of comments on my former history teacher's Facebook in her discussion of the WBC Supreme Court decision on First Amendment freedoms, and it occurred to me that my stance is so skewed because of current day politics, I wouldn't have dreamed I'd be here ten years ago. Then again, I could say that for quite a few
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
And while I agree that vocal opposition is the foundation, I think it's a bit extreme to think of societal freedoms in black and white terms. That was partially the point of my line of thought - that while preservation of free speech should be paramount, it occasionally interferes with other individual liberties (such expectation of privacy in this instance).
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
I find the WBC to be reprehensible, and hope that all manner of bad things befall them. However, we cannot limit their freedom of speech without accepting those limits for ourselves. And I don't want my freedom of speech limited.
What the WBC does is disgusting, in poor taste, and morally indefensible. However, we can do the exact same thing, and when they protest in our neighbourhood, we can counter-demonstrate and hold up signs that ridicule them and mock them. Usually when people start laughing at them, rather than shouting at them, they tend to leave earlier than their announced time.
And while I hate that they can protest at funerals and at gay pride events, it means that I have the exact same right to protest them, and maybe make them look a little more stupid each time.
Reply
Leave a comment