Good points and well said.capybyraSeptember 21 2009, 04:36:12 UTC
To my emotional logics? It's a composite query so to speak. One aspect is of an absolute "Pass/FAIL" for Sexuality as flesh on flesh being either done or not. Either it's sex in the flesh of whatever non-quibbling degree it is- or it's not an issue because there WAS no touching
( ... )
Re: Good points and well said.thunderbiscuitSeptember 21 2009, 13:45:12 UTC
Makes sense indeed.
You know, coming from a catholic upbringing, the discussion on lust is a funny one for me. As you may or may not know, Catholicism is really big on lust being a problem. Ten commandments no-no. But you often have to wonder if it's really that bad if the act is never physically pursued. I know it's still weird for a lot of people to think that this person or that person lusts over whatever questionable subject, but does it really matter if it's all in that person's head? Hmmmm.....
Oh! And no harm done. :D You're far from being a stalker.
Comments 2
Reply
You know, coming from a catholic upbringing, the discussion on lust is a funny one for me. As you may or may not know, Catholicism is really big on lust being a problem. Ten commandments no-no. But you often have to wonder if it's really that bad if the act is never physically pursued. I know it's still weird for a lot of people to think that this person or that person lusts over whatever questionable subject, but does it really matter if it's all in that person's head? Hmmmm.....
Oh! And no harm done. :D You're far from being a stalker.
Reply
Leave a comment