Listening at live performances: a new level of hearing

Jun 19, 2011 23:19

I've posted in the past about attending live theater and using the assistive listening devices (ALD). Without ALDs, results were not satisfying, I had tried using on the processor:
1) Everyday program: sound is "mushy" and I understand very little of the dialog, though music sounds nice
2) Noise reduction program: dialog is easier though my ( Read more... )

cochlear implant

Leave a comment

Comments 10

sfkev June 20 2011, 12:53:28 UTC
So wonderful to see your post!

Reply

thorendor June 21 2011, 15:42:46 UTC
Thanks! It's been a while.

Reply


dr_scott June 20 2011, 18:51:18 UTC
You're doing about as well understanding dialog and lyrics as I am! Many musicals I only get half the lyrics. The change in style with miking and more rock-influenced music has not improved comprehension... and the older brain has more trouble separating signal form noise.

But great news. Now you can deteriorate with the rest of us! :-)

Reply

thorendor June 21 2011, 17:18:34 UTC
Oh joy, yet something else to look forward to. :)

Reply


bearfuz June 21 2011, 00:25:16 UTC
Have I told you before how fascinated I am and how much I love reading your reports? I dare say that you may have followed the dialogue and lyrics in TOTC better than I did on Thursday (when I was sitting up in the nosebleed section)!

You're my hero.

Reply

thorendor June 21 2011, 17:25:56 UTC
I need to clarify: the 80% referred to the lyrics at [Title of Show]. We had front row seats at a small theater. Tales of the City was much more of a challenge to understand, between being up in the loge and the crummy acoustics at ACT; I followed much less there.

Reply

bearfuz June 22 2011, 19:39:33 UTC
Ah! Okay - I had the two shows reversed. This actually makes more sense; if you were in the loge at ACT, I can see how the acoustics probably worked against you. It may have been mixed better for the folks down below.

And as I recall anyway, there was often a LOT going on aurally at what I would consider to be some key moments; the show seemed to me to be cluttered with extra choreography and, often, extra background vocals at times when simplicity would have better served the storytelling. (If they hope for this show to have a future in New York or elsewhere, I hope they fix some of these problems.) So if it was problematic even for those of us who have had a lifetime of experience filtering out lead vocals from background stuff, it must have been worse for you!

Reply

thorendor June 23 2011, 16:31:17 UTC
Good point and I've updated the entry to reflect. Thanks for pointing it out.

Reply


fuzzybearcub June 21 2011, 05:53:04 UTC
The human brain loves a challenge. Good for you. :-)

Reply

thorendor June 21 2011, 19:47:52 UTC
Thanks hunky!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up