The pronunciation of what? Exactly.

Sep 18, 2006 13:17

Gene Weingarten wrote in yesterday's Washington Post:
I am a "word person." My vocabulary is extensive, my command of grammar and syntax almost without error. I can accurately conjugate most any verb, including "to lie," which gets pretty complex in the pluperfect. I understand the difference between epistemology and hermeneutics.

And so it came as ( Read more... )

dr.whom

Leave a comment

Comments 12

madfilkentist September 18 2006, 17:41:45 UTC
I pronounce "what" to rhyme approximately with "gut," but not quite; thinking about it, I find that my pronunciation of the vowel is very close to the modern Greek short "a." Maybe that's part of my personal accent, which always bewilders people.

Reply


keristor September 18 2006, 18:44:52 UTC
In standard British English 'what' rhymes almost exactly with 'got' (and, yes, with 'squat'). Some accents have a leading aspirate on the 'w' ('hwot', which if I remember correctly is one of the older English spellings), some aspirate the 'w' itself (which I find difficult) and many omit the aspirate completely ('wot' just like 'got'). I don't know any English native who pronounces it like 'gut'.

Reply


I go both ways... hvideo September 18 2006, 21:09:13 UTC
My pronunciation varies. Usually I will pronounce "what" to rhyme with "gut", but in some circumstances I will rhyme it with "squat". I think it is the emphasis on the word that tends to bring out the "watt" version. I have both a quiet, puzzled "Say wut?" and a loud, outraged "Say watt?!?"

Reply


majikjon September 19 2006, 00:47:36 UTC
It is the nature of a language to change. English has undergone countless shifts in pronounciation over the centuries. (Especially our use of Diphthongs, which was one of the primary shifts from the middle English of Chaucer to the more modern English of Shakespeare.)

The accepted American pronounciation equates "What" with "Gut", simplifying the diphthong sound into a simple schwa sound. The British still elongate the vowel, and rhyme it with squat. Who's right? Who was right 100 years ago? Who will be right 100 years from now? Who can say?

Reply


annonynous September 19 2006, 02:19:56 UTC
Well, not the first listed pronunciation, anyway. My Random House dictionary (1966 - '67, so this isn't a recent degradation / innovation) lists six pronunciations - hwut, hwot, wut, wot; unstressed hw*t, w*t (where * is an upside down, backwards e, the name of which I'm not remembering).

There should be a joke somewhere here, based on that Abbott & Costello baseball routine, but I'm not coming up with it either. :(

Ann O.

Reply

panthyrr September 19 2006, 04:36:43 UTC
Schwah?

I think?

Reply

annonynous September 19 2006, 05:35:31 UTC
Yep, that would seem to be it. It's a transliteration from the Hebrew, so the spelling (terminal h) may be variable.

Thanks!

Reply

Who? majikjon September 19 2006, 21:55:24 UTC
Here's may favorite spoof of Who's on First, courtesy of Kids in the Hall ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up