(Untitled)

Feb 12, 2010 23:06

What a shame about that Judge Holloway getting wrapped up in criminal acts. If we can't even trust a man that should be ensuring that justice is served, then whom can we trust ( Read more... )

karla sofen

Leave a comment

Comments 145

revengeisbitter February 13 2010, 05:09:25 UTC
What's your definition of a good person?

Reply

drmoonstone February 13 2010, 05:11:12 UTC
I asked first.

Reply

revengeisbitter February 13 2010, 05:12:11 UTC
Well for one, a good person will never say they're good.

Reply

drmoonstone February 13 2010, 05:13:59 UTC
Even if they truly believe themselves to be so?

Reply


zealouspeter February 13 2010, 05:10:39 UTC
You might as well ask, ma'am, why there are people who drink or eat rotten meat.

Reply

drmoonstone February 13 2010, 05:12:09 UTC
So you believe them to be victims of circumstance?

Reply

zealouspeter February 13 2010, 05:13:50 UTC
The first does it for enjoyment; the latter does it out of necessity.

Situations vary. There can be no simple "why."

Reply

drmoonstone February 13 2010, 05:18:38 UTC
The wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that the law is against those who weren't born with a silver spoon in their mouth?

Of course each situation varies by circumstance, but there must be some moment where the person does what is considered wrong and knows it.

Reply


justanavatar February 13 2010, 05:11:02 UTC
It doesn't take a lot.

Reply

drmoonstone February 13 2010, 05:13:03 UTC
Then why is it hard for some?

Reply

justanavatar February 13 2010, 05:14:17 UTC
Maybe you're expecting the wrong thing.

Reply

drmoonstone February 13 2010, 05:19:16 UTC
Really?

Reply


neverstagnate February 13 2010, 05:13:08 UTC
One can always trust the facts, madam.

Reply

drmoonstone February 13 2010, 05:21:31 UTC
It's better to take them with a grain of salt until you have the big picture though. I commend the research the reporter put into her work, assuming that the facts are indeed true.

Reply

neverstagnate February 13 2010, 05:26:44 UTC
Facts are just that, factual, madam. If they are false, then they were never facts to begin with. If one has to do significant digging to find the facts, then it would be in their best interest to do so.

Reply

drmoonstone February 13 2010, 05:32:12 UTC
Facts can still be left to interpretation though, depending on one's point of view.

Reply


mentis_reae February 13 2010, 05:33:45 UTC
"Whom" can we trust.

[A pause]

And yes. It was extremely courageous of her.

Reply

drmoonstone February 13 2010, 05:37:14 UTC
[Adds the 'm' after a moment.]

I honestly wasn't expecting to read such a thing when I picked up the Bugle that day. I'm surprised it was printed.

Reply

mentis_reae February 13 2010, 05:37:53 UTC
I myself rather revised my opinion of the paper upwards.

Reply

drmoonstone February 13 2010, 05:43:15 UTC
I might have to as well, if the investigation is legitimate. The article being in the Bugle doesn't exactly help it's credibility, stimulating as the article is.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up