Man vs. Chimp, An Exploratory Analysis

May 07, 2009 16:22

Recent news of a woman being brutally attacked by a chimpanzee has sparked  debate with my roommate over whether I could defend myself against an attacking chimpanzee or I, too, would end up mauled and handless.

In my "research" I came across two Google Answers threads entertaining the same question. Bruce Lee vs. A Chimp; who would win?. The ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 5

(The comment has been removed)

thesasseffect May 9 2009, 06:21:40 UTC
All of your points were addressed. You should really read the entry-- much more important than eating chips.

Reply


thejameslehman May 8 2009, 23:39:19 UTC
Even if it were as small as a Rhesus macaque, I'd put my money on the non-human primate.

Reply

thesasseffect May 9 2009, 06:22:19 UTC
but isn't that a depressing thought? that despite our highly superior intellectual advances we're as meek as mice? perhaps i just don't want to believe it..

Reply

thejameslehman May 9 2009, 13:27:32 UTC
Compared to macaques, we're weak little aliens. All things being equal, it wouldn't be hard for a post-pubertal male to win.

And additionally, if the human gets a scratch and contracts herpes B, he or she will have only an 20% chance of survival without treatment.

Reply


gameshints May 9 2009, 22:13:02 UTC
What the fuck?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up