Funds Pulled from Planned Parenthood [UPDATE]

Feb 02, 2012 06:34

Susan G. Komen for the Cure, the nation's largest breast cancer charity, has pulled hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants toward breast cancer screenings from Planned Parenthood, citing it's newly implemented policy that they will not award grants to groups under investigation from the federal government. This is great news for many in the pro ( Read more... )

health, pro life, abortion

Leave a comment

Comments 23

jacobs_muse February 2 2012, 11:57:34 UTC
Yeah, this is good news.

Reply

trevelyanl85a2 February 2 2012, 12:07:44 UTC
Not really. Even though you may not like Planned Parenthood, they do provide legitimate services for people who cannot afford such things at regular clinics.

The problem with the Komen foundation is that they've been too arrogant with marketing and less on focusing on funding. I've heard a report how they tried to sue another group simply for them using the words "race for the cure" I believe. .....

Reply

eajou February 2 2012, 14:11:09 UTC
Yeah. I tried going to "birth control centers" that were NOT Planned Parenthood and some were religious based and they told me that they couldn't even help me get birth control and I should only be calling them if I was pregnant. I'm like, dude, I'm in college and uninsured and you want me to wait to do anything with my reproductive organs UNTIL I'm pregnant. Actively seeking BC here, WHY IS THAT A BAD THING?! Planned Parenthood was the only place around here that offered anything in the way of prevention services.

Reply

zansa_san February 2 2012, 17:48:51 UTC
Your on-campus health clinic doesn't provide BC ...?

(And many clinics with religious affiliations are for pregnancy crisis, specifically. They also typically don't condone premarital sex. If you don't want to be told to keep it in your pants, there are plenty of secular clinics to choose from.)

Reply


kharmii February 2 2012, 12:19:16 UTC
The only 'bullying' that's going to happen will be in the form of super-wacko comments from the fanatical left on Komen's facebook page. I wouldn't want to be friends with her and weed through my flist on FB.

Reply


eajou February 2 2012, 14:20:44 UTC
Those supporting Planned Parenthood can choose not to donate to the breast cancer charity. In my opinion, THAT shows an abortion-first mentality instead of someone willing to support women's health and well-being.

No.

It is my understanding that different PP offer different services depending on their funding. Just because a few can't offer full-out 100% reproductive services does not mean that there are not PP out there that do offer those services. Also, the exact quote regarding mammograms was, “We actually don’t have a, um, mammogram machine, at our clinics.”. However, that does not mean that they do NOT help women get mammograms. It means that they don't have the machines THERE. Not to mention, mammograms is not the extent of woman's health necessities. For example, PP also does pap smears, provides birth control (unlike other places that will only help you if you are already pregnant) and so forth. Every PP has different levels of funding. If not for PP then I wouldn't have had ANY support towards my health and well-being in ( ... )

Reply

w0rdinista February 2 2012, 16:03:09 UTC
However, that does not mean that they do NOT help women get mammograms.

True, but if they were primarily acting as a referral service, sending women to clinics where they can get mammograms (and usually not for free), then why were they receiving funds earmarked for breast exams and mammograms? All other reproductive issues aside (since Komen is geared towards breast health and cancer awareness, prevention, and cures -- I don't see where BC pills and pap smears really have a place in this particular debate; go to PP for birth-control, sure -- for me, that's what "Planned Parenthood" is supposed to mean: be a parent when you plan it), if the money is meant to be for mammograms, and PP is acting as a referral service... that seems... I don't know. Not quite right ( ... )

Reply

eajou February 2 2012, 16:24:57 UTC
Nah, I've never had a mammogram there so I don't know. Nor do I particularly have a view on the fact that the funds were pulled from PP. I do not know whether or not PP does not provide ANY mammograms in any of their clinics or what, I was just throwing an alternative out there because people keep stating that the quoted statement "proves" that PP has nothing to do with breast health. Which may or may not be true, IDK. They could do mammograms there or they could ALL be referrals, IDK. But keep in mind that they might not have done mammograms in that particular location, but that does not mean that PP does not do mammograms in any location either.

However, the allegation from the OP was that donating to PP makes you not someone willing to support women's health and well-being, which insinuates that the ONLY reason that PP exists is against supporting women's health. This is not true because PP does offer services outside of abortions that help women who cannot afford to get these services otherwise; services that "alternative birth ( ... )

Reply

w0rdinista February 2 2012, 18:45:17 UTC
Well, I know the quoted statement came from one of 30 PP clinics in 27 states, none of which provided mammograms, and all of which referred the caller to a different clinic.

I don't particularly agree with the OP's stance that PP's sole objective is anti-women's health. I have known people who've had medical reasons for needing BC pills, and could only afford them through PP. (I myself have had to be on BC pills for a medical reason that, thankfully, got cleared up. Though I hate the damn things myself -- every time I've tried them, I have horribly unpleasant side-effects.) That said, I cannot help but feel that the voices touting PP as a leader in breast-health and breast cancer awareness (as some on my F-list have been doing) might not be aware of the fact that -- in at least 30 clinics -- they are a referral service rather than one that actually offers mammos (when the PP CEO/President did in fact state that it was a service they offered ( ... )

Reply


mosinging1986 February 2 2012, 15:02:36 UTC
Cecile Richards, the current president of Planned Parenthood, equated the actions of Susan G. Komen for the Cure to "bullying".

Boy, that's rich, coming from PP!

We'll see how long before the Komen organization changes its tune.

Just as those against abortion chose not to donate to Susan G. Komen for the Cure while it was funnelling money to Planned Parenthood, those supporting Planned Parenthood can choose not to donate to the breast cancer charity. In my opinion, THAT shows an abortion-first mentality instead of someone willing to support women's health and well-being.

It's not just your opinion. It's blunt fact. Murdering children is PP's first and foremost goal. And God help you if you stand in their way.

Reply


lazypadawan February 2 2012, 20:19:59 UTC
Susan G. Komen was idiotic for ever getting into bed with Planned Parenthood in the first place. It doesn't matter what other services PP provides or if they are valid or not. I don't care if they do mani/pedis. They perform abortions and since I consider abortion murder, I wouldn't want one red cent of my money going to them for any reason. Other pro-lifers have felt the same way for years. I'm sure this has affected Komen's fundraising and I'm sure they've had trouble partnering up with churches and other religious organizations for this reason. Why this never occurred to Komen, I'll never know except that perhaps some lefty ideologue running the organization wanted to show her buds at PP some love by making a donation.

Now that Komen publicly broke away from PP, the other side is unhappy. Komen should have just stayed out of the abortion issue period.

Reply

rightsaidred February 3 2012, 00:27:03 UTC
Pretty much all of this. ^^

Reply


Leave a comment

Up