It was Toronto Trek. They've never had a good gaming track, but since they moved to their new venue it's gotten worse; everything is now squeezed into one room, and the gaming panels are held in that room, which doesn't have a pannelists table at the front.
I don't know if Gamers don't go to SF cons, or if SF cons just treat the gaming content poorly. It was dissapointing.
"Panels were good. Should have prepared more for SF Cinema in review. Gaming panels are getting worse each year. They have stopped providing a room for them,and simply shunt them into the gaming room, which pretty much destroys them
( ... )
First off, putting panellists at a round table pretty much eliminates the need for panellists. You can just hold an 'open discussion'.
Admittedly, a panel like "Nice Game" doesn't really need any sort of moderation of direction (thank God), because it can work as just an unfocussed bitch session, unlike most panels.
I actually preferred the panel as a discussion in round rather than the typical pracice of placing panelists behind a table which almost makes them look like some sort of annointed experts.
Amusing fact: They ARE experts, or at least they're supposed to know enough to make them worth listening to. Otherwise it's some kind of namby-pamby chatroom bullshit.
Hay, your blogging panel was good, I enjoyed it. And I think I was on a panel with you, talking about "DC on TV, Marvel for movies", or something like that. I thought that it went well(I hope it went well), it was my frist time being a panelist, and you made it fun.
Comments 10
Secondly, why is gaming in the doldroms with SF fandom?
Or is it the opposite, gaming fandom has moved on?
::B::
Reply
I don't know if Gamers don't go to SF cons, or if SF cons just treat the gaming content poorly. It was dissapointing.
Reply
Reply
Admittedly, a panel like "Nice Game" doesn't really need any sort of moderation of direction (thank God), because it can work as just an unfocussed bitch session, unlike most panels.
I actually preferred the panel as a discussion in round rather than the typical pracice of placing panelists behind a table which almost makes them look like some sort of annointed experts.
Amusing fact: They ARE experts, or at least they're supposed to know enough to make them worth listening to. Otherwise it's some kind of namby-pamby chatroom bullshit.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
But I can be wrathful and sleepy pretty much simultaneously.
Reply
Reply
It was a pleasure to work with you as well. I'm sure we'll do many panels together in the future as well.
Reply
Leave a comment