Leave a comment

Comments 19

castalie August 29 2006, 13:49:08 UTC
How much do I adore that on-going fic of yours? A LOT, yes. It's not just hot but it's almost unbearably sensual and that's a combination that fills me with glee. I also love the characterisation and love the slow build up. I can't wait to read more. Great job!

Reply

nina_ds August 29 2006, 20:17:13 UTC
Thanks! I'm glad people are still enjoying it... or even remembering it's here! We started this, oh, last November, I think? And it's only the first of at least 3 parts we've got plotted out, what with RL and other bunnies. But whenever I exhaust Jack, Nine, and Rose, I can hop over and play with Ian and Charlie. Best of both worlds, really!

Reply

1trackmind August 29 2006, 23:36:56 UTC
So that's all they are to you? A break from when you've exhasuted your other toys? ::sniff:: :P

Reply

nina_ds August 30 2006, 04:08:27 UTC
Not at all, not at all! As soon as Ian and Charlie are exhausted, I go back to Jack, Nine, and Rose. Variety is the spice of life. ;-) Although interestingly, both pairs of men have the same colouring. I don't know why that strikes me as odd, but it does! Jack and Nine are even the same height...

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

nina_ds August 30 2006, 19:11:11 UTC
Though it is the *ultimate* in delayed gratification.

It only took, what 3-4 months? :-) What stamina!

I'm so glad you're enjoying.

Reply


newtypeshadow October 2 2006, 18:15:18 UTC
hello. i just found this fic last night, and am thoroughly glad you're continuing it. (and that i got here at a point where i didn't have to delay gratification too much. *is bad at that*) i stayed up till the wee hours reading and rereading because it's amazing and hot, and the characterization is excellent. i was looking for some charlie/ian that didn't involve ian being a complete and utter manipulative, soulless bastard one-dimensional jerk, and you totally made him a believable, multi-dimensional person.

and the sex was hot. please, let's not forget the sex.

*melts*

more? *begs*

Reply

nina_ds October 8 2006, 15:56:17 UTC
Welcome! I've just updated the userinfo, which should explain a few things...

I'm so glad you thought the characterization was good. For me, at least, the sex is pointless if the characters aren't in character. I'll admit, I can see the appeal of dark!Edgerton, but he's so much better when he's got more than just meanness to him. One of the most amusing things for us has been that we seem to be developing the characters in ways that anticipate what we see on the screen. When I first wrote the section about Ian giving Charlie his coat, it was before Toxin, and I thought, "Okay, maybe I'm nicening him up too much," but then they gave us a more relaxed Edgerton and a Charlie eager to see him again for no spoken reason.

We're still going. Just slowly.

Reply

1trackmind October 10 2006, 04:58:21 UTC
For me, at least, the sex is pointless if the characters aren't in character. I'll admit, I can see the appeal of dark!Edgerton, but he's so much better when he's got more than just meanness to him.

Yes and yes! I've never been a big fan of PWP, I need emotional depth, too.

Reply


mona_may56 October 5 2006, 21:41:44 UTC
I come from newtypeshadow's lj who recommended that story and I'm not disappointed! This story is unbelievably hot and sensual. I love the characterizations of both Charlie and Ian.
I can't wait to read the next parts ^^

Reply

nina_ds October 8 2006, 16:02:01 UTC
I'm glad you found us and that you're enjoying it. Welcome!

Very, very slowly, we continue. This is only one part of three we've got planned, it's just getting the time and headspace to do the writing. And I like to wait until I'm really "in the mood" - I think the writing's better for it!

Reply

1trackmind October 10 2006, 04:11:26 UTC
I think the writing's better for it!

Me too!

Reply


irena_adler January 17 2007, 23:12:09 UTC
Wow, talk about not rushing! I was almost wanting to say, rush, already! *g* Very sweet, sensual, and loving.

Reply

1trackmind January 17 2007, 23:41:08 UTC
LOL I'm glad you're enjoying it. The current delay is my fault.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up