A Tale of Two Economic Policies: Obama vs. Walker Edition

May 20, 2012 11:32

Walker's Trickle Down Austerity vs. Obama's Restrained Keyensianism


Read more... )

wisconsin, austerity measures, recoveries, stimulus bill, obamanomics, keynesianism

Leave a comment

Comments 11

nebris May 20 2012, 18:32:08 UTC
I'm waiting for that jackass austerity pimp who commented on the last post to come by and tell us all to suck it up.

~M~

Reply

sinistertim101 May 21 2012, 00:05:01 UTC
How lovely :-)

I replied already if you care to read. I should include some links from Peter Schiff. He was the only one who saw the recession before it happened and was mocked on Fox news for it.

Take a look

He was right and predicts the depression to continue its crash that was merely delayed due to high debt. You can't consume if you owe money.

Reply

nebris May 21 2012, 05:20:42 UTC
"of course liquidating civil society and driving down the living standards of your citizenry will not return an economy to growth; any idiot can see that." http://the-recession.livejournal.com/900792.html

Reply

sinistertim101 May 21 2012, 06:49:42 UTC
There is no growth when debt is huge and everyone from the citizens who owe too much to consume, to banks who can't lend because they are waiting for bonds to mature.

The solution is a recession as people pay it back. Then banks lend again and all is good.

Reply


You are only looking at the immediate short term sinistertim101 May 20 2012, 23:55:33 UTC
Austerity is the only way to recover long term.

If everyone defaults the banks go out of business and it wont matter if there is high consumer demand as businesses will still go under waiting to get paid as lines of credit freeze up. You can't keep your shelves filled without paying and then skimming the top margins after the products are sold.

Austerity will reduce demand short term but give plenty of capital left to banks and 401ks. They will in return lend to small business and us instead of government bonds.

That is good for economic growth.

Reply

Re: You are only looking at the immediate short term brittdreams May 21 2012, 00:41:08 UTC
What? Why do you think the banks will go under? People already defaulted and the banks were given a bailout by the governments of the world to prevent them from going under.

Also, can you explain what you mean by short-term? And perhaps explain how this will affect the regular folks that are already struggling to survive? Because I'm not sure I give a damn how much capital is left in someone else's 401K (I don't have one so there can't be any in mine) when I barely have enough money to put healthy food on the table.

Reply

Re: You are only looking at the immediate short term nebris May 21 2012, 02:17:37 UTC
He's either a Libertarian jackoff who's ideologically [aka theologically] committed to this line or an actual 'austerity pimp' who's paying job it is to push this bullshit across the various blogs and comment threads.

~M~

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


Leave a comment

Up