Not sure if this helps but I have a Panasonic pocket camera that makes decent enough photos. Panasonic cameras have Leica lenses which are really good. At least the model I and my Dad own do.
I do like the idea of the IXUS, purely because it's the newer model of the one I had - didn't know if that was a good enough reason to choose a camera though =) Which models do you/have you had?
I also had an IXUS cam :) But it's pretty old now, I don't know the exact model. But I loved it and it made really good pics :) And now I have the EOS 450D and I still have an EOS 300.
My last 2 cameras have been Canons, and I have loved them both. If it is something where you might be helping him out initially, having a camera you are at least basically familiar with is good.
That being said, my first digital camera and my mother's current one were Kodaks. The only bad thing about my old Kodak was that my current phone has more megapixels, so enlargements came out pixelated. Other than that, it took some great pictures. My mom's camera was one she found for about $89, and it is surprisingly good. It looks very similar to the Kodak you linked. It is fast and responsive enough to take great kid and pet pictures, which is what she got it for.
Seconding the person who mentioned the panasonic lumix ones; they're quite good for a pocket cam! I have a canon ixus too, which I'm very fond of (I think it's one a step up from the one you've linked to), but in general Canon is a good brand and they make good, durable products. I had one of the early EasyShare cams, and I wasn't too impressed with it. Granted, it was quite a few years ago, but it was slow and complicated and didn't produce pictures of a quality high enough to make up for the things I felt it was lacking. They might've gotten better, I shan't be able to say, but I'd put my money on the Canon :)
I have checked them out now on Amazon and some of them appear to be incredibly expensive, and I really just can't afford that kind of money, sadly. I do think though that Canon would be a good bet, so am going to do a bit more research into what I can afford in the Canon range.
Thanks so much for taking the time to chip in here lovely ♥
They are quite a bit pricier than the canon ones, but admittedly, they do also take better pictures. I will say however, that the canon ones produce absolutely fine pictures, especially compared to the price of the cameras! Good luck finding the right one, darling. ♥
Comments 17
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Thank you ♥
Reply
No prob :) ♥
Reply
Reply
That being said, my first digital camera and my mother's current one were Kodaks. The only bad thing about my old Kodak was that my current phone has more megapixels, so enlargements came out pixelated. Other than that, it took some great pictures. My mom's camera was one she found for about $89, and it is surprisingly good. It looks very similar to the Kodak you linked. It is fast and responsive enough to take great kid and pet pictures, which is what she got it for.
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Thanks for your advice =)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
I have a canon ixus too, which I'm very fond of (I think it's one a step up from the one you've linked to), but in general Canon is a good brand and they make good, durable products. I had one of the early EasyShare cams, and I wasn't too impressed with it. Granted, it was quite a few years ago, but it was slow and complicated and didn't produce pictures of a quality high enough to make up for the things I felt it was lacking. They might've gotten better, I shan't be able to say, but I'd put my money on the Canon :)
Hope you've had lovely holidays darling! *hugs* ♥
Reply
Thanks so much for taking the time to chip in here lovely ♥
*hugs*
Reply
Good luck finding the right one, darling. ♥
Reply
Leave a comment