Nov 13, 2009 15:00
Do you think Kyle deserved to die for trying to throw Wanderer into the river? If you were in Wanderer's position, would you have let him live or would you have wanted him to face the consequences of his actions?
weekly: discussion
Leave a comment
Comments 12
Reply
Idk WHY I like Kyle as a character since he's such an ass for most of the book, but I think it's because we see him change at the end?
Reply
Reply
Reply
If I was in Wanderer's place, the only reason I would want to help him out of the river is because I'd hate to see anyone die, even if they hated me and I hated/feared them.
Reply
Reply
At the same time though, I understand how these humans living on the brink don't have much choice. I mean, Mel got off lucky with Wanderer but since after her the Souls decided to take a fiercer tact against the humans, there's only a very tiny chance that Kyle would be able to escape and not give away the location of the caves. That would kill everyone, so obviously that makes his crime and punishment way more serious. (Sorry, stating the obvious.)
Anyway, there needs to be punishments for actions in this cave society, no matter how severe they seem to us. (Normally I think some time in prison would suffice for Kyle.) Considering the sort of post-apocalyptic situation the humans are living in I don't think I would have a big problem voting for Kyle's execution ( ... )
Reply
Overall I agree with you, though I would be terrified of Kyle - I don't know if I could take being responsible for voting to end his life.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment