I remember, some time after the film for Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire came out, having a conversation with
orange_crushed about different takes of the dragon in fantasy, and how so few films with dragons as a central element seem to work (eg. Eragon, Reign of Fire, DragonheartAttempts to domesticate the dragon in fiction, especially when they are supposed
(
Read more... )
Comments 12
::writes YES in the margins with aggressive black gel-pen::
This is why I fangirl you so very, very hard. Among all the other reasons.
Reply
Reply
You win my Best Quote from the Flist for this week. Just... excellent.
Reply
Reply
Oh, Nic Clarke is on to something. I feel the same way. Dragons as force-of-nature are interesting. Dragons-as-pony are not.
LeGuin's dragons are among the few that interest me. They can speak to humans, and they sometimes do; but they'll just as often take a bite or a sheep or a lazy flight around the village torching everything. Ged gets one to obey him, so to speak, by knowing his name. But he never "tames" him.
It's interesting that you tie it to the Cylons, too, because I think there's a lot of nonhuman "metaphor" characters running about, being terribly misused in fiction. Too often it becomes a black-and-white split between the "good" nonhumans (who are subservient, gentle, die to save their human masters/friends) and the "bad" nonhumans (who either want freedom, which is treated like a bad thing, or are just evil killing machines.) That's depressing to me, because I see too much of a global colonial past in crap like that.
Reply
Reply
LeGuin does so many things right, though, as regards magic.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Hahahaha. YES.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment