stuff

[the_grynne]

Comments

[rodlox]

so long as it has Irene Adler, why add more villains and opponents for Holmes than are neccessary?

[the_grynne]

Irene isn't classically a villain though. I would be unhappy if they made her out to be one.

[rodlox]

maybe I'm thinking too much of The Baker Street Irregulars, which had those kids working for Holmes, who had been set up by Adler.

[fan_elune]

I cannot wait for Repo! It is the one film right now that is giving me something else to wait for so very eagerly, until Watchmen. That trailer sucked me right into it the moment I saw it, and man, seeing Tony Head in such a part... I just can't wait.

That QoS poster is so. very. disappointing.

Do you know, one of my favourite Sherlock Holmes adaptation remains Young Sherlock Holmes. I'm not the hugest Holmes geek, though I've read and enjoyed quite a few, but that one I just sincerely enjoyed when I was a kid, and growing up. Plus I dig the very last post-end-credit scene so hard. Moriarty = love, and he should so be in that movie. Come on! (...Law for Watson? I liked Farrell better.)

[the_grynne]

I like the lush Sophia Loren-ness of the female lead in that poster, but the poses are just so boring.

I prefer Farrell for Watson too, just because I think he'd be more interesting, and a better foil for Downey. But I'm excited that McAdams is going to be involved.

[fan_elune]

There's just nothing arresting about it whatsoever, I'm sorry. Daniel Craig can so easily command attention, and this? Doesn't.

Absolutely and completely on both counts.

[kismeteve]

So, I was looking at some shots from the new Alice movie, and look what I saw:

[the_grynne]

*cries*

HolmesHolmesHolmes

[kismeteve]

:(

We need to become millionaires to finance this thing.