Call and Answer Part I

Jun 13, 2007 12:23

Ok, can you explain why you have such an obsession with girls in glasses; do you know why you do? ANd you can unscreen this if you like.I'm not sure I'd call it an obsession!!! *gasp!* Er, ok...so maybe it is...but I suspect that it's not nearly as bad an obsession as some of the super-perverts around here, eh? Amirite?! Anway, I guess that the ( Read more... )

sieur-veys, meme-pires, you make loving fun, his imperial highness, historically speaking

Leave a comment

Comments 18

seraphimsigrist June 13 2007, 16:55:57 UTC
Thomas J Jackson(Stonewall) was pretty good too
although he was not overall commander even within
the eastern theatre of operations.
with Belisarius I would raise the question of the
quality of his opposition?

Reply

cordilleran2 June 13 2007, 21:06:21 UTC
Well, one of his major foes was Shapur II, one of the greatest of the Sassanid Monarchs, outside Khrusao II (the one responsible for Heraclius' claim to fame), and Sassanid Persia was at it's first great hight of power. Very disciplined armies, and extensive cavalry.

Not sure about the armorment of the Vandals in Carthage, however. I do know that they had trounced a previous Byzantine expidition there during the time of Leo I, if I recall correctly; so they were a force to be reckoned with.

The Ostrogoths in Italy had one of the most diciplined armies in europe, outside of the Byzantine empire, so it was not an easy task--and it too 20 years of warfare as it was.

I do agree with your sentiment about Stonewall Jackson, and I think i would add Robert E. Lee to your list. I think to this day he's still the only person who graduated from West Point with a 4.0. I seem to remember hearing that somewhere...

Reply

seraphimsigrist June 13 2007, 21:24:41 UTC
I suppose we would also have to weigh the
claims of Napoleon, of perhaps even Douglas Macarthur
of Hannibal...a problem is in comparing people of
various eras,of opposition etc it is a little like
the problem of comparing baseball players of one
era with those of another.

Reply

the_epic June 14 2007, 14:19:16 UTC
I agree.

Reply


mencc1701 June 13 2007, 17:05:52 UTC
Totally agreed with you on your first answer.

Reply

the_epic June 14 2007, 14:19:34 UTC
Excellent taste, sieur.

Reply


gaelic_flame June 13 2007, 17:22:30 UTC
First answer - damn straight. Redheads are my mortal weakness.

Second answer - I'd have to add some more: Erwin Rommel (he may not have been excellent, but he was extraordinarily lucky on many, many occasions), Montgomery (for beating Rommel - Monty had a great brain for espionage and desert warfare), aaaaaaand... there was someone else, but I've forgotten.

Can you tell that WWII is my era?

Reply

the_epic June 14 2007, 14:20:11 UTC
Completely, heh heh. How about Patton? I <3 that guy.
I smell a bigger post coming on.

Reply


bluegrasshopper June 13 2007, 18:00:49 UTC
mwah hah hah... <3 Barbarian Week. LOVE IT. and the Goths were one of the best durn programs on it! ::dances::

Reply

the_epic June 14 2007, 14:20:38 UTC
I HATE THE VISIGOTHS!

Reply

bluegrasshopper June 14 2007, 22:32:49 UTC
I'm indifferent, truth be told. but it was still a dang good program! =]

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

the_epic June 14 2007, 14:21:21 UTC
You know, I've always intented to, plus I think David Drake had a book like that too, didn't he?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up