Addendum to part III

Oct 11, 2005 19:57

It has occurred to me that some of my assertions are open to question, especially as regards Thales and the Egyptian calendar. My point is not so much the question of who or when the idea of leap year was implimented, I know it probably came later. My emphasis is on the discovery of the cardinal nature of numbers as they relate to ordinals. We ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 9

pooperman April 10 2006, 17:00:08 UTC
(This is a response to this post that I'll post here instead of joining the community at the moment.)

Nice post--I wanted to explore your hand example a bit.

(Note that some of this is inspired by a chapter on topology in Ian Stewart's Flatterland, a book I cannot recommend enough to anybody for any reason ( ... )

Reply

thanks thales1940 April 11 2006, 06:05:40 UTC
I am also an absolutist, a non-mystical absolutist, which means my absolute is derived from experience.

I want to think about your post before I go further.

Reply

pooperman April 12 2006, 03:22:01 UTC
thales1940 April 14 2006, 04:14:12 UTC
A magician takes a deck of cards and removes all the sevens. He then removes any 7 of the remaining cards. He lays both sets face down and bets the next sucker/passer-by that he can predict of the two stacks which will be "the sevens stack". The lie is in the use of the term "the" used to imply unity, and so, the idea is planted that of the two stacks, only one is described by "the sevens stack ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up