Leave a comment

zapf_chancery January 20 2012, 21:09:59 UTC
Oh, is that what we're doing? Weird combos? OK, here's a few.

Reilly/Dunham - defined
Reilly/Dunham - tiger
Reilly/Dunham - new
Reilly/Dunham - private

Hunter/Skye - disabled
Hunter/Skye - center
Hunter/Skye - absent
Hunter/Skye - outgrown

Taylor/Wash - battlefield
Taylor/Wash - hero
Taylor/Wash - intrigue

(These are non-shippy, but eh, I'm easy)
Jim & Taylor - motion
Jim & Reynolds - flex
Jim & Maddy - terror
Taylor & Reynolds - goldmine
Taylor & Elisabeth - crossing
Elisabeth & Wash - fable
Elisabeth & Wash - guilty
Wash & Maddy - duty
Wash & Maddy - alliance

Reply

bellakitse January 20 2012, 21:48:35 UTC
weird couples or regular couples, the more the better. :)

Reply

sky_kiss January 20 2012, 23:50:39 UTC
*cough* I may support Reilly/Dunham a bit...won't lie....

Reply

morganel January 21 2012, 00:11:17 UTC
*grumbles*

Reply

sky_kiss January 21 2012, 00:45:56 UTC
What can I say? I support couples that actually have some interaction in canon, ;)

Reply

morganel January 21 2012, 03:44:01 UTC
Bleh bleh bleh bleh bleh. *not listening* He's such a baby face! My denial shall be the death of me.

Reply

zapf_chancery January 21 2012, 04:28:47 UTC
Baby-face with male pattern baldness are Reilly's favorite! :)

Reply

morganel January 22 2012, 02:36:35 UTC
Nuh-uh. Sexy raven haired lieutenants are.
(I'm just playin)

Reply

zapf_chancery January 22 2012, 03:05:15 UTC
Fine, if you're gonna be mean, I'm just gonna take my Wash/Reilly - edge and go home.

(just kidding, I'm already at home)

Reply

morganel January 22 2012, 15:06:24 UTC
Oooh no. Don't do that.

Reply

bellakitse January 23 2012, 21:57:13 UTC
Prompt Filled - Battlefield mercscilla January 27 2012, 16:33:34 UTC
Prompt filled HERE. :D

Reply


Leave a comment

Up