Can someone please provide me with evidence of Barack Obama's misogyny - legislation, comments, policies, etc.? I keep on hearing about it, but somehow I'm not seeing it. I am not saying it's not there, but I would really like someone to point me towards some examples
(
Read more... )
Comments 30
Reply
I'm disappointed about Novick as well.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
In a way, I'm sorta-glad that Clinton hasn't dropped out yet, because the race is revealing some interesting (if unsavory) stuff about the electorate.
Reply
I was just being lazy, I guess. My apologies.
Reply
At the rally, drenched in the good vibe, he did concede that he'd made a few mistakes in badmouthing his current opponent. I got the feeling that he'd figured out there's very little he can say about her that will help his campaign, and lots he could say to shoot himself in the foot.
Between the two of them, though, I'd say that she's been far more guilty of talking shit than he has. Not that she's sounded particularly misandronous, or racist, but just that she's got a very low opinion of John Q. Public and what we'll believe.
Looking at the google hits, the most damning evidence I could get, was him talking about her metaphorical 'claws', making her sound like a cat or a harpy. From what I've heard her say, it's an apt metaphor, maybe that means I'm as misogynist as he is. Anyway, I ( ... )
Reply
him saying along the lines of she has really broken some stereotypes/boundaries, as if a black man isn't breaking as many boundaries as an old b*tch. come on now, obama. we see through you.
vote the party, everyone. don't go to independant/green on this one.
Reply
Reply
And here's more. You could check the comm's memories for more links I'm sure.
Reply
http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/30/why-calling-out-misogyny-matters/
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/11/02/the-gender-card-theme/
Reply
In the first link above "Everything... Kindergarten", they talk about "having tea" or "being a wife" as being sexually coded statements - but they don't actually CITE him saying those exact things. Nor does the piece that the blogger's post was originally taken from. If he said those specific things, why would they have been edited out, when they could have the specific inflammatory power to take him down several pegs?
I still fail to understand. But I haven't had time to do my Google blitz yet. I am, after all, at work.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment