Recently I got into an online "argument" on Facebook with an old friend of mine from high school. And now it looks like I won't be able to see him in the same light again.
It all stemmed from a posting that a former English teacher (at the same school) put up about the Ayn Rand magnum opus Atlas Shrugged. She spoke of both the book and its
(
Read more... )
Comments 17
That said, I don't think that's where Rand was going; rather than saying "these traditional programs don't help the poor, so let's do this other thing," as far as I'm aware she didn't care what happened to the poor at all, which doesn't line up especially well with traditional Christian views on the subject.
Reply
However, that's not quite the problem here. I'm dealing with people who are touting the "I-worked-hard-and-don't-want-to-HAVE-to-help-others" line while claiming to be "good Catholics." Hence the cognative dissonance.
Look, at the end of the day all I ask for is consistency. If one wants to be a Christian, they have every right to be a Christian and live their life accordingly. Similarly, if one wants to be a selfish pr*ck, they have every right to be a selfish pr*ck and live their life accordingly. But as far as I remember from my theology classes, one can't really be both a Christian and a selfish pr*ck. To maintain consistency, you have to give up one to live the life of the other.
IMHO. YMMV. OMGWTFBBQ. :)
Reply
They may also be doing a bit of the deserving victim thing. People who have tragedy strike, but who are 'good' (in the subject's terms) can deserve help. But OMG people who just are down on their luck/haven't had as many breaks/are going through a bad patch? Sucks for them, b/c they don't 'deserve' help.
This meme is often also common with the 'right kind' of rape-victim, as well as the 'deserving poor'.
Humans have trouble with the idea that someone, somewhere, MIGHT get something for nothing, while "I" had to work for it.
*shrug* *throws in Tuppance*
Reply
In other words, people being people. They have a bad habit of that. :)
Reply
Reply
I was raised on it too, and if we had a dollar for every "set-in-stone-no-two-ways-about-it-do-this-and-you'll-burn" turned "wishy-washy-oops-we-better-start-making-more-popular-rules" thing about the Catholic church, you could forward our mail to Easy Street.
Deep breath. Allow these folks their much protected freedom. Agree to disagree. No two people are ever going to agree on everything - including you and me. It's not worth stressing over.
=^_^=
Reply
C'est la vie...
Reply
That might be what's going on here.
People *do*, in general, cherry-pick data points that support their opinions and ignore the rest, too. That's pretty well documented. :D
Reply
Don't get me going on Jonah Goldberg and his "Liberal Fascism". He is trying to re-write history to make Fascism a "liberal" phenomenon. It works in right wing circles where many of the kool-aid drinkers are convinced that Obama is fascist. Seriously.
Reply
I decided to bite my tongue and not remind him that lawyers from Regent University (one of the worst law schools that still has accreditation) were technically Law majors, but that doesn't make them good lawyers. And of course, GWB himself majored in business (MBA from Yale) prior to running several businesses into the ground. And for that matter, I was an education major; if I was a better teacher I'd likely still be employed as one...
Courses of study and the credentials "earned" from their completion mean nothing without the critical thinking skills to use them properly. But I digress...
Reply
Leave a comment