(Untitled)

[tankou]

I do not care if a company puts up a half-naked girl to sell me the clothing she actually is wearing. For one thing, it catches my attention. For another thing, who cares if you see some tits? They're just tits. And as for it being exploitation, if she's the one posing and getting paid, I see no problem

Comments

[yechezkiel]

Because they look like real (pretty, but real) people and not airbrushed clones from central casting?

[yechezkiel]

I am pretty sure that if there is any exploitation going on at AA it's because the owner is a weirdo. IIRC, though, none of the lawsuits against him have ever been proven.

For the most part: I love the company, they make t-shirts that actually fit me. Because they have smaller torsos than most companies, I can wear a large (which I have to for my shoulders) without looking like I'm in a tent.

[dealatedwren]

I like AA's ads but I do not approve of the fucked up stuff their owner does

I'd totally steal from them though

[skatendrum]

theyre also real bad to the people who work there, apparentlies. and they find small designers and steal ideas, thats why they have an indie feel, because they steal independent designers designs, and there is nothing the little person can do against the big bad big person. urban outfitters also.

[tankou]

That's true, but I don't shop at either one of those stores. And there is still nothing wrong with their advertising.