[Forewarning: no spoilers in this post, although the article linked to within the post is extremely spoiler-heavy.]
I saw Avatar in IMAX 3D last night. It was... well, there really aren't any words. Frolic and I sat there silently for about five minutes afterward, and then I said, "Holy fuck." Yeah, I'm coherent when I'm awed
(
Read more... )
Comments 18
Reply
Honestly, I think it's a shame if you let that keep you from seeing this movie - it's that much of an experience. But I know everyone has things they feel strongly about - goodness knows I certainly do! ;)
Reply
CAMERON: Right from the beginning I said, “She’s got to have tits,” even though that makes no sense because her race, the Na’vi, aren’t placental mammals.
So it's tits for tits' sake, not because it makes any sense in the creation of the species. :/
I'm sure it's brilliant, visually, I'm not doubting that. :)
Reply
Huh. I wonder what they are then. I saw no evidence of egg-bearing or anything like that.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Cameron said he came up with the idea and story 14 years ago but there wasn't the 3-D technology yet to visualize it. That's why he spent so long filming underwater and playing with 3-D cameras. I'm guessing the anti-war theme stemmed from Desert Storm but can still be applied to Afghanistan/Iraq/entire Middle East.
I loved when Colonel Quaritch referred to the Na'vi as terrorist- despite what the humans were doing. As they say, "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter".
Reply
It seems that most critics of it have been a bit more muted in their response to it. As in, they praised its visual techniques, but when it came to the story of it, they thought it was pretty weak. None of them seemed to be quite as enthusiastic about it as you seem to be, and, even if I haven't seen the movie yet, it's nice to see something a bit more glowing for a change.
Reply
I'm not sure what else they were expecting from the story; we knew going into it that it's an human invader/alien native conflict set on a different planet. Those stories really only have two ways they can go, which is either the invaders winning or the natives winning. But I thought that there were some amazingly detailed aspects in this movie and the emotionality of the story was well-explored.
As Frolic put it (paraphrasing here), "You can pretty much reduce any story to being boring if you just look at the bare bones. Okay, here's Romeo and Juliet: boy and girl fall in love, their parents don't like the other person's family, they die. But obviously there's a whole lot more to the experience than just the synopsis."
Reply
Reply
and I loved it too! I really want to move there, b/c I'm secretly an anthropologist at heart.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
It would be nice if she went to see the movie and then apologized for the ways she got it wrong and wrote a new analysis of what actually IS wrong, but I doubt we're going to see that much humility from her.
Reply
Toruk Makto.
(Sorry, couldn't help myself. Had to look it up.)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment