Truthers v Birthers

[enders_shadow]

This may well start a shit-show. Not looking to, but I realize the potential

Comments

[enders_shadow]

You clearly do not understand the theories that 9/11 Truthers put forth.

Truthers claim that there are members of the supposed "19" that still live.

So it wouldn't have required them to actually come to the US.

You fail at understanding the conspiracy.

[underlankers]

Without anyone like say, Mullah Omar, producing these living hijackers to show that say, the US invasion of Afghanistan was all a lie? I don't need to probe arcane theories that like all conspiracy theories are quasi-religions that vastly oversimplify reality.

[enders_shadow]

And yes, the conspiracy theorists posit a high number of unknowning collaborators. They are the most useful kind.

[underlankers]

While refusing to attribute to Saddam Hussein or Mullah Omar the canniness needed to produce the living hijackers to show "see, there was no attack".

[enders_shadow]

Again, remember, *IF* this was an inside job, don't you think the CIA would be keeping tabs on such folks?

[underlankers]

ROFLMAO no I do not, as the USA's intelligence agency didn't even realize after one bombing of the Twin Towers that the Terrorists might try again.

[root_fu]

Steel framed buildings have never been destroyed by fire in all of human history.

Despite this, people think they can ignore the historical precedent and pretend office supplies and a little bit of diesel is sufficient enough to stand history on its head.

[meus_ovatio]

You are simply wrong. Look it up. There are dozens of examples of steel framed buildings behind destroyed by fire. Your lines are tired and rehashed to a sickening degree.

[root_fu]

Ur rong

[underlankers]

Did you tell this to the cities of Cologne and Dresden?

[root_fu]

They dropped bombs on those cities.

Bombs not equal to fire.