Error? Or Fraud? (Could it be....SATAN?!?!?)

Apr 08, 2011 08:31

In the ongoing saga of the Wisconsin GOP/union battle, a new wrinkle is on the latest battlefield. This past week was the scene of the election of a Wisconsin Supreme Court judge. The incumbent is one David Prosser, a conservative who is generally considered to be aligned with Governor Walker. The challenger was the state Assistant Attorney General ( Read more... )

wisconsin, court, elections, scandal

Leave a comment

Comments 68

(The comment has been removed)

farchivist April 8 2011, 13:04:38 UTC
Fascinating. No doubt it will be investigated, I'm sure. I bet we can expect to see some hefty accusations of general incompetence. I'm also sure we'll see some litigation from somewhere on the election results, what with this foolishness.

I LOVE me a good dose of scandalous ambiguity.

Reply

blueduck37 April 8 2011, 17:37:23 UTC
Regardless of whether fraud occurred here or not, can we all agree that partisan county clerks shouldn't be allowed to keep election results/data on their personal computers?

Reply

underlankers April 8 2011, 19:05:40 UTC
Hopefully, yes, this is one of those things so basic to a democratic, civilized society nobody would disagree with it.

Reply


dreadfulpenny81 April 8 2011, 13:02:48 UTC
Seems like Chicago-style politics are bleeding into Wisconsin. There were uncounted ballots in Mequon, WI that were allegedly shredded and thrown away. If that's true, it's illegal. Funny how the count for that area was highly in Prosser's favor...

Reply

farchivist April 8 2011, 13:07:42 UTC
dreadfulpenny81 April 9 2011, 21:02:04 UTC
I didn't hear about it from that blog. Several people I know from WI were talking about it on Twitter.

Reply

farchivist April 10 2011, 00:14:55 UTC
I haven't been able to find any corroborating evidence from a local or national news source and there's neither a statement from the City of Mequon or the Wisconsin Government Accountability Office, so I think we can safely discount that as rumor for the moment.

Reply


allhatnocattle April 8 2011, 13:23:08 UTC
Should try out a good old paper ballot, the kind you mark an X on. It's simple to count and recount. And because there's so many returning officers involved in the tallying, it pretty impossible to fraud.

Reply

kinvore April 8 2011, 13:50:04 UTC
Yeah I wish we would adapt this system, I think they use it in Canada? At least I saw a story about it during the 2000 Presidential election.

Reply

chron_job April 8 2011, 15:59:08 UTC
Scantron.

Automatic paper record, combined with the possibility of instant automatic tabulation. We use it in our county in Florida.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


kinvore April 8 2011, 13:46:02 UTC
Not sure if any of the links you provided mention it (that's a lot to go through haha) but what will make this look even more suspicious is that the Republicans needed over 7400ish votes to block an automatic recount. Two days later they find 7500.

It COULD be a coincidence but there needs to be a thorough independent investigation to make sure.

Not sure what to think myself at this point, I'd like to see more facts before deciding one way or another. Naturally being the partisan that I am I find it all suspicious but it could be that Prosser won fair and square.

Reply

geezer_also April 8 2011, 15:17:21 UTC
"I'd like to see more facts before deciding one way or another"

What kind of attitude is that in this age of instant communication? No one seems to need facts to form an opinion, go with your gut!!

Reply

airiefairie April 8 2011, 21:10:51 UTC
Search your feelings my son, you know it to be true. =)

Reply


mahnmut April 8 2011, 14:46:41 UTC
Hey? Cut? Yay! Thanks.

Reply

airiefairie April 9 2011, 12:06:55 UTC
I find your lack of lj-cut disturbing. =)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up