The Great Climate Change Hoax....

[steve_potocin]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.htmlRead more... )

Comments

[allhatnocattle]

Childish replies so far.
You cannot have a debate over science, any science.
Data is not to be argued. Data is to be compared, replicated, and reviewed.

But here's the facts so far. The polar ice sheets are melting which is going to cause a flood and make weather more severe and extreme. To stop this we must recycle our bottles, turn off the lights and drive hybrids.

If this makes sense to you, you're a brainwashed sheep. How about actually doing something about the impending doom? Seriously do something that will actually counter the impending doom. I mean if there's a hurricane coming, how is driving a Prius going to help? Sane people seek shelter during a storm.

[root_fu]

I favor debate over sciene.

[omnot]

I favour science over sciene.

[root_fu]

Ha, you cant even spel!

[thies]

Oh yeah.

[saint_monkey]

AWESOME.

[verytwistedmind]

What flavor is that!? I'm thinking vodka and cherry....

[the_rukh]

That structure doesn't look up to code.

[new_wave_witch]

BTW I asked a Scientist friend of mine about global warming and heres what he had to say: ""Climate science is not indicative of science in general. The problem with climate science is that it’s ‘special’. Special because neither side seems to want to discuss the actual science. At some point, we are eventually going to have to talk shop and evaluate the data openly and rationally.

Scientist friend of mine

‘special’

[omnot]

Ooh, be careful! Do not disrespect the OP's speshul insider knowledge or they will call you a sheeple, and possibly tell you to "wake up".

[mahnmut]

You - you mean - they'll use (whispers) sarcasm??

Gasp!

[omnot]

No, worse than that.

They will be deadly serious.

*facepalm*

[anfalicious]

You are aware that he wasn't the only one gathering data. This seems to be largely a media spin of words by a scientist who probably shouldn't be talking to the media. He's pretty clear in there that none of what happened means what the article thinks it means.

Also, Daily Mail, LOL

[mahnmut]

Wow, it's conspiracy week!