He is such a buzzkill...

May 04, 2017 11:15

While we are about alarmist apocalyptic predictions, let me mention Stephen Hawking. The older he gets, the more pessimistic he seems to be. Now he is saying that humankind should colonise another planet within the next 100 years if it wants to prevent its own extinction. In a new documentary that he is making for BBC, he will make his argument in ( Read more... )

science, space, hypothesis, civilization

Leave a comment

Comments 18

abomvubuso May 4 2017, 14:18:45 UTC
While we're about grim predictions, NdGT has something to say about America's future as well.

Reply


oportet May 4 2017, 16:23:24 UTC
They'll have to keep it a secret, or the inevitable debate will be - who gets to go? Space colonization may be possible, but it ain't possible for 8 billion people. When the time comes, it's likely that many who are left out of the man-made rapture won't be too happy about it.

Reply

htpcl May 4 2017, 18:32:24 UTC
Something like last night's development in The 100. Hard choices, brother.

Reply


policraticus May 4 2017, 20:01:40 UTC
It seems to me that if we can develop the technology to colonize Mars (the most likely choice in our neighborhood) we will be able to deal with our problems here on Earth. The challenges we need to overcome to establish a self sustaining Martian colony are orders of magnitude greater than adapting to climate change, rebuilding after a major war, or surviving a new plague, plastic eating worms or whatever.

I agree with him about AI, though. And I think that we should shut SETI right the fuck down and take our whole planet off the cosmic grid, as much as we can. The last thing I want to do is advertise our existence to a species capable of interstellar travel.

Reply

htpcl May 6 2017, 16:02:42 UTC
How do you propose that we stop broadcasting into space?

Reply

policraticus May 6 2017, 18:29:01 UTC
Well, we can't stop the ambient radio waves, at least not with our current technology. But we can stop actively broadcasting "here we are, come and visit!" messages hoping the ET who visits will be benevolent.

Basically, I would prefer we not advertise our existence as much as possible.

Reply

htpcl May 6 2017, 20:29:28 UTC
We've already done it. We've been doing it ever since the radiowaves got used for communication.

Reply


luvdovz May 4 2017, 20:14:49 UTC
What makes anyone think that colonizing another planet would just make all our problems go away, as opposed to transferring them to other places and expanding them (the problems) beyond Earth?

Reply

mikeyxw May 4 2017, 21:40:39 UTC
Exactly. My bet is that within a few hundred years, our colonies would have an array of planet busting MAD type weapons aimed at the Earth and vice versa... or at least the AIs that wiped us Earthlings out would.

Reply

htpcl May 5 2017, 04:03:23 UTC
Reminds me of The Expanse. :-)

Reply


luzribeiro May 10 2017, 08:11:24 UTC
"Let’s see if I have this right: we have trashed the earth - with the help of science, I might add, given that he asserts technology-gone-wrong is part of our current mess - so now what? Earth be damned, we must save our own hides, and quickly? Ah, yes. So many more planets to ruin, so little time."
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/05/08/why-stephen-hawkings-dire-warning-is-all-wrong-about-humans-and-earth.html

Very good point.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up