I know, it's a constitutional right: if you still have citizenship of your country of origin, most constitutions say it shouldn't matter if you've lived abroad for decades. You have the right to vote.
For example, federal law gives US expats who no longer are residents of any state the right to vote in presidential, senate and house elections in
(
Read more... )
Comments 11
If we're to exclude all expats from voting for the sake of blocking some poisonous phenomena like the one you mentioned in Turkey, then we'd have to scrap all those citizens who are probably more useful to their country than many still living in the country itself.
Oh, and for the record, I'm one of those.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
As for your expat voting question, being an expat myself, I would disagree. I live in Sweden but I'm still actively involved with Icelandic politics. You'd have to do some pretty lame legislating magic to discriminate against certain groups that you dislike without violating all possible principles of democracy and human decency.
Reply
They've been kept all this time because of the notion that they maintain the ethnic peace by holding certain minorities under control. This has given them a free pass to do as they please within their domains - which has undermined people's trust in statehood in this country, and has emboldened those minorities to a point where they're now blatantly discriminating everybody else within their regions.
This will have to stop one way or another. I hope not the Yugoslav way.
Reply
Reply
Reply
As an American, you carry your citizenship with you wherever you go, for as long as you go. This is a common tradition, reaching right back to the old "Civis Romanus sum." Any diminution of those rights are going to be based on arbitrary standards extrinsic to the person themselves. So, it is conceivable that a person living as an ex-patriot could be just as, if not more than, engaged in the politics of the US than a person who is residing inside the US. Considering how many US citizens fail to vote when it rains, accepting a vote mailed from 8,000 miles away under onerous conditions seems like a fair thing. And if they are not engaged, so what? If we disenfranchise people based on their ignorance of policy then we'd have to disenfranchise a lot of people, some of who are members of Congress.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment