Rendering Unto Caesar: Piercing the Pentagonian Corporate Veil‏

Feb 18, 2014 08:38

We had an incident at our test facility that gave us some insight into the way that American military priorities are established. A representative from the American military began to make noise about the intellectual propriety of neural wave technology. The man claimed the technology to be private property demanded monopoly status in its ( Read more... )

military, industry, caesar

Leave a comment

Comments 52

fizzyland February 18 2014, 17:19:09 UTC
I had a spooky dream once where a narrator was saying that in order to boost the U.S. economy, the NSA would be broadcasting commercial interruptions into our dreams every seven and a half minutes.

It's bad enough that Capitol One can show up at your home or workplace uninvited but now, we'll be hearing Lawrence Fishburne asking "What's in your subconscious?" during otherwise relaxing nighttime viking adventures.

Reply

sophia_sadek February 18 2014, 17:23:46 UTC
That is probably exactly what would happen if the boyz at the Pentagon have their way. The applications that we promote would obviate such crass commercialization.

Reply


luvdovz February 18 2014, 18:01:24 UTC
Sure.

Reply


ddstory February 18 2014, 18:02:40 UTC
Hey, I was hoping to learn more about those neural wave machines, and my prayers have been met!

Reply

sophia_sadek February 18 2014, 18:05:50 UTC
The material Creator of the flat and immobile Earth must have had something to do with this posting. What it was, I have no clue.

Reply

ddstory February 18 2014, 18:07:40 UTC
I've been feeling the same about most of your posts through the years, so there it is.

Reply


kylinrouge February 18 2014, 18:40:31 UTC
Conspiracy theories

Numerous individuals suffering from auditory hallucinations or mental illness have claimed that government agents use microwave signals to transmit sounds and thoughts into their heads, referring to the technology as "voice to skull" or "V2K".[12] Extensive online support networks have sprung up for people fearing mind control. Psychologists are divided over whether such sites negatively reinforce mental troubles or act as a form of group cognitive therapy.[13]

This is glorious.

Reply

sophia_sadek February 18 2014, 18:50:19 UTC
Proof positive that psychiatry is a legitimate practice!

Reply

telemann February 18 2014, 19:17:22 UTC
Thanks for that. The New York Times has a long article about this phenomena. "Sharing their demons on the web."

For people who say they are the target of mind control or gang stalking, there may be enough evidence in the scientific literature to fan their beliefs. Many sites point to MK-ULTRA, the code name for a covert C.I.A. mind-control and chemical interrogation program begun in the 1950s.

Recently the sites have linked to an article published in September in Time magazine, “The Army’s Totally Serious Mind-Control Project,” which described a $4 million contract given to the Army to develop “thought helmets” that would allow troops to communicate through brain waves on the battlefield. And the users of some sites have found the support of Jim Guest, a Republican state representative in Missouri, who wrote last year to his fellow legislators calling for an investigation into the claims of those who say they are being tortured by mind control.

Reply

sophia_sadek February 18 2014, 23:22:49 UTC
So, do you believe that it is impossible that people have been harassed by agents using such equipment? I probably would have thought so myself before working on developing neural wave networking technology. Fortunately, I encountered the technology before encountering stories of people who claim to have been targeted.

It does not surprise me that psychiatrists are concerned that people making such claims need to be treated for a supposed illness. Psychiatry has an abysmal track record of discriminating a simulated condition from one that is more natural. They have no test to determine if an individual is telling the truth when reporting about hallucinatory experiences much less distinguishing between a simulated and genuine experience.

Reply


lafinjack February 19 2014, 00:18:58 UTC

... )

Reply

sophia_sadek February 19 2014, 16:29:18 UTC
My condolences.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up