Forget the crisis!, urges Krugman

May 18, 2012 21:28

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-speed-read-paul-krugmans-end-this-depression-now/2012/05/04/gIQALJl31T_story.html

The governments should finally start spending, Nobel laureate in economics Paul Krugman recommends in his new book End This Depression Now, where he sharply criticizes the austerity programs. So let's look a bit closer.


Read more... )

leftism, economics, books, crisis

Leave a comment

dwer May 18 2012, 19:24:51 UTC
certainly, Austerity hasn't worked yet, and we know spending will.

Reply

the_rukh May 18 2012, 20:58:47 UTC
Oh and Iceland.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

the_rukh May 18 2012, 23:24:02 UTC
Yep in the article itself it states that they have not remained unscathed yet they are doing much better than most the rest including having a higher employment rate than the US. They still have their social safety net intact and have managed to revive their local banking industry too.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

the_rukh May 18 2012, 23:38:19 UTC
It's a good example that there is successful ways out that don't involve chopping down the foundations of your society though.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

the_rukh May 18 2012, 23:47:30 UTC
That's very true. The biggest benefit of their way though is it doesn't cause the suffering of a large portion of their population, that's why I brought it up.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

oslo May 19 2012, 01:23:16 UTC
Your claims, unsurprisingly, require facts not in evidence.

Unsurprisingly, your facts are cherry-picked and decontextualized for reasons not explained.

To begin with - why measure "austerity" in terms of GDP? Isn't the relevant comparison the budget/expenditures/income? A $1 billion cut doesn't seem very big against a GDP of $200 billion, but it would represent a significant cut if the budget was $2 billion initially (not that I'm claiming Ireland's budget is that small).

Second - the "headline" figures you've cited omit the breakdown of how those particular savings were achieved. A $1 billion cut that is achieved by an even and balanced set of expenditure reductions and tax increases is a good deal less austere than the way Ireland actually achieved this result, which - surprise! - involved significant cuts to social programs and increases in income taxes ( ... )

Reply

oslo May 18 2012, 23:11:54 UTC
Other failures of austerity: UK, Italy, Portugal.

The response here is usually that austerity just hasn't had a chance to work its magic, but the truth is that many of these countries have been moving towards austerity or outright austere for a while now. And there's an additional truth: no one could really expect austerity to grow economies. That's just not what austerity is designed to do; you take a bunch of government spending out of an economy, particularly debt-financed spending, and what you get is a smaller economy. It's supposed to be harsh medicine that's necessary to restore confidence, but it fails to do this, again and again, precisely because it causes economies to shrink, deficits to grow, and further austerity measures to be taken ( ... )

Reply

rasilio May 19 2012, 00:36:47 UTC
Draconian budget cuts?

The only Republicans who have proposed budget cuts are the Pauls, even Ryan's plan does not cut the budget until something like 2025 with budgets increasing year over year even after adjusting for inflation every year until then.

How can spending increases be a draconian budget cut?

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

kylinrouge May 19 2012, 02:35:59 UTC
Are the public sector and private sector even in the same business? Aren't most jobs created by small businesses? I've never went to a government-owned clothing store or restaurant.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up