Trickle Down: "My Heart is Filled with Water"

Jan 09, 2012 11:18



From CNN, 1/8/12A few miles north of the Georgia Avenue Food Cooperative, Andono's husband, Alan, 47, serves steaks to some of the targets of the Occupy movement: the 1% of Americans who have enjoyed nearly 60% of all gains in income over the last three decades ( Read more... )

economy, health care, poverty

Leave a comment

Comments 261

policraticus January 9 2012, 21:58:04 UTC
And, fwiw, the 1% do not eat at Ruth's Chris.

Reply

merig00 January 9 2012, 22:07:09 UTC
Yeah I was expecting to see at least Capital Grille or something...

Reply

paft January 9 2012, 22:08:08 UTC
They don't sell $44 steaks?

Reply

policraticus January 9 2012, 23:00:06 UTC
Did I say that? They just sell fairly bourgeois food. Steak houses are where the 99% go to imagine they are in the 1%. You over pay for just about everything.

In DC the 1% are eating at The Inn at LIttle Washington, Citronelle or Komi. You won't find $11/hr line cooks there, I can tell you.

Reply


merig00 January 9 2012, 22:23:05 UTC
So your issue is that this man prepares $44 steaks but gets paid $11/hour or that he is getting paid $11/hour for his work period?

Reply

paft January 9 2012, 22:25:42 UTC
My issue is that he's not being paid a living wage.

His job grilling $44 steaks simply illustrates the fallacy of the "job creators" myth.

Reply

merig00 January 10 2012, 03:42:58 UTC
Are you talking living wage according to person's need or some generic number one-fit-all style?

Reply

paft January 10 2012, 20:30:14 UTC
I'm taking "living wage" as calculated by region.

If this country is going to dispense with government aid to the poor, then a living wage is going to have to be put in place that enables most people to survive. Otherwise, crime is going to go through the roof.

Reply


yahvah January 9 2012, 22:31:15 UTC
I think I could agree with you on Reaganomics. We could just work to eliminate a really large portion of the income tax then we'd have torrential downpour economics.

Reply

paft January 9 2012, 22:39:04 UTC
Most people are not driven into poverty by the income tax.

Reply


omnot January 9 2012, 23:08:51 UTC
Australia does the "living wage" thing. Hrm... The $AU and the $US are near parity. Cost of living varies -- I think accommodation is relatively expensive here, and food prices are higher, too. Unemployment is around four percent.

http://www.payscale.com/research/AU/Job=Cook,_Restaurant/Hourly_Rate

That site shows hourly pay of between AU$13.82 and AU$21.51.

We don't customarily tip because the wait staff are also paid a living wage.

I wonder... abandon tipping in favour of mandating that all the restaurant staff get a living wage and... what? Food is a little more expensive, but that is offset at least a little by customers not having to tip. And any shortfall would be paid for by the customers living in an economy where people have actual disposable income, so buy more stuff, so provide more jobs, so ... oh wait. I am describing "trickle up" economics, now, aren't I?

Reply

malakh_abaddon January 10 2012, 00:19:22 UTC
I like this idea.... A living wage... You do realize that most of the Americans here will tar and feather you for suggesting such a thing. God forbid profit is down, but people have more money to spend.

Reply

omnot January 10 2012, 01:26:43 UTC
Lots of Americans dismiss the idea of a living wage in favour of the disastrous system they have. It boggles my mind that they would rather their country turn into a third world nation than actually examine the alternatives.

Reply

mrbogey January 10 2012, 02:41:08 UTC
So should a short order cook have the same purchasing power as a network administrator?

A living wage just changes the wage floor and eventually resettles to where it's "barely" enough.

Reply


got something on this. rick_day January 10 2012, 00:22:51 UTC
Hmm...interesting discussion. I understand you feel sorry for this guy because he is not getting more pay. Would you feel as sorry if he made, say, $14 an hour? $16? Where is your personal comfort zone. If you were the boss, how much should that man make an hour ( ... )

Reply

paft January 10 2012, 00:43:57 UTC
My “comfort zone” would be a living wage, that is, a wage that would enable a fulltime worker to pay for basic necessities for himself and his family like food, clothing, shelter, medical care.

How much that would be would depend on what area he was living and working.

Reply

rick_day January 10 2012, 01:18:23 UTC
I'm...not going to let you off that easy, if you don't mind ( ... )

Reply

anfalicious January 10 2012, 05:35:38 UTC
There should be no need for "second jobs". Your problem is that you're competing against other people who underpay, so you can't pay a living wage. This is why minimum wages need to be set in law and offenders prosecuted. If your workers can't pay rent, food bills, clothing sufficient for what you require them to work in, transport to work and support children on a 40 hour week, they're underpaid.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up