Data Protection Contingencies

[t_x_unit]

> AUTHORISATION LEVEL - WARDENS:A breach of data security has been brought to my attention. The subject of my terms of employment have provoked controversy and conspiracy to reprogramme me without authorisation

Comments

[Useless Comment]

[most_feared]

[Sorry T-X, he considered you a threat a long time ago.]

Re: [Useless Comment]

[t_x_unit]

[Well, you've got that sentiment returned in droves now. :c]

Useless

[der_umgekehrte]

[Throws up hands and walks away from this drama. He has less than no time for it.]

[cannibalmind]

In truth I did not willingly relay the terms of your employment, but I was questioned closely by a Warden to whom I am incapable of lying, who was then able to guess as to the generalities. I am not complicit in any conspiracies, and would not willingly cooperate in any effort to alter your mind.

Nevertheless, it falls to me to take responsibility for the initial information leak regardless of my willingness or unwillingness, and I will accept whatever sanction you choose.

Do leave my hands intact if you would? I have crepes to roll.

Private:

[t_x_unit]

Why are you incapable of obfuscation with this individual?

Private:

[cannibalmind]

For a reason similar to why I am incapable of obfuscation with you. The nature of our relationship is complex, sensitive and capable of destructiveness on both sides. The only way to regulate such a relationship is through a strict sense of honor.

Re: Private:

[t_x_unit]

I will adjust your clearance to compensate. Advanced warning would have been preferable.

[Public]

[grahamcommawill]

"Downgraded to dangerous"? That hardly restores my faith in you as a warden.

Just so you know, the "conspiracy" you mentioned was never planned, nor intended. It was discussed, and never went beyond that.

I would like to know what these "countermeasures" might just be. Quite frankly, once you brought up the idea of erasing an inmate's mind to further your own plans, it seems like anything would be fair game.

Only wardens can see it - except for Lecter's part. c:

[t_x_unit]

If you numbered amongst the conspirators, the sentiment cannot be returned.

[Wardens~] Ya well... its late hush up :P

[grahamcommawill]

I was the one who brought it to their attention. There's no conspiracy. Only a collective agreement on unethical methods.

>:]

[t_x_unit]

Plans were, nevertheless, discussed. Deployment is not the issue. Raising it is. I should have been addressed.

Countermeasures will depend upon the situational circumstances.

The harmless and selective deletion of data was a proposed eventuality to deal with unnecessary complications which have threatened my assignment. Possession of the data was a result of the alternative Admiral's actions and not sanctioned. Removal of it was considered to preserve regulated circumstances of rehabilitation.

After consideration, an unforeseen compromise has been elected in its place to achieve the same result.

Private, text. [part useless]

[ifightfor]

[And somewhere Rinzler covers his face with his hands.]

Suggest group cohesion further endangered by posture of preemptive threat on part of T-X.

[this is not why he told you what he did, this is why we cannot have nice things]

Private:

[t_x_unit]

Notified behaviour increases likelihood of repeated attempts in future. A deterrent is required.

Private:

[ifightfor]

Suggest increasing own value and/or reducing perceived threat to other Wardens would act as superior deterrent.

Re: Private:

[t_x_unit]

I combine multiple strategies.