Livejournal
Log in
Post
Friends
My journal
sylvar
Maybe it's a silly question, but I suspect it isn't...
Mar 18, 2008 19:07
Why is there no 'g' in 'theorem'?
etymology
,
english
,
greek
,
linguistics
Leave a comment
Comments 4
creases
March 18 2008, 23:16:27 UTC
Where would the g go?
Reply
regality3
March 19 2008, 00:38:53 UTC
Theoregm, as in phlegm?
Reply
creases
March 19 2008, 00:56:50 UTC
Ah, okay. Well, the issue here is that there are different roots (and also different suffixes).
The g in words like "phlegm" or "paradigm" is part of the root (phleg-, heat; paradeig-, to exhibit beside), not the suffix. The suffix is -ma.
The root for "theorem" is theōr-, which means to behold. The suffix is -ēma.
Does that answer make sense?
Reply
sylvar
March 19 2008, 02:46:35 UTC
Yes, thank you. That was exactly the sort of answer I hoped to get.
Reply
Leave a comment
Up
Comments 4
Reply
Reply
The g in words like "phlegm" or "paradigm" is part of the root (phleg-, heat; paradeig-, to exhibit beside), not the suffix. The suffix is -ma.
The root for "theorem" is theōr-, which means to behold. The suffix is -ēma.
Does that answer make sense?
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment