My notes to you fine folks are in bold type. :-)
Please do not answer these questions just quite yet- right now I am just interested in your input on framing this survey as a whole. Am I forgetting anything? What should I add? Remove? Clarify
(
Read more... )
Comments 28
In your 'Native Americans' selection, you might want to include something like Native Americans and Indigenous peoples - especially if you plan on getting this survey answered by those who live in places like Australia - where the issue isn't 'are Native Americans pagan,' but 'are Indigenous Australians pagan.'
Community is unnecessary in paganism.
This is a confusing statement to me. As I both agree and disagree with it - does it mean that pagan communities are important? That pagans must be part of a spiritual community? That solitary practices are therefore not important? Or does it mean mundane communities? Does it mean subcultures or over-arching cultures. Community in this context is a confusing statement.
Reply
And quick question; if we are going to talk about "liberal" in terms of politics, does it mean the same thing here in Oz as it does in the USA? I mean, I know we have the Liberal party here which is very similar to the Republicans in the US, but if we use "liberal" in the context that I did in the statement: "All pagans are liberal in their politics" does it mean "not conservative ( ... )
Reply
Reply
I still can't find a suitable way to word the community statement, but I'll mull it over some more once I get some food in my tummy.
LOL at the duck story! They are such funy birds- I can picture exactly what you described. Birds have no sense of size; they are like chihuahuas when they face us: "I can take ya, put up your dukes, come on, come on, I'll bite ya in the kneecap!"
Reply
And I'd rephrase "Modern paganism is one united religion whose practitioners all believe and/ or practice the exact same things." to something like "Modern paganism is a single religion with a shared set of beliefs and ethics." (Unless you want almost no "yes" answers. Most idjet-fluffhead-neowiccabunnies agree that paganism has lots and lots of different "traditions," by which I believe they mean "they use different ornaments in their Samhain rituals ( ... )
Reply
I like the idea to reword the statement "To be a pagan, all you have to do is say you are pagan". You are right, it is biased, and the way you suggest further on is more along the lines of what I want to know. I only included it that way as it seems to be the opinion of both Dana Eilers and Pagan Australia Network (how is that for diverse); instead I may just have to point out in the book why I feel that defintion isn't correct ( ... )
Reply
"To be a pagan, all you have to do is believe you are pagan."
Reply
Am I making sense or have I been sitting at this compuer for too long today? (Sheesh, it's almost midnight; I've been sitting here since 8am! Well, except wuith breaks to chase wayward ducks, take care of too many animals, prepare food & eat, and occasionally stretch my legs. I may need to put down the mouse and get to bed soon.)
Reply
But yeah, if you haven't gotten all the input you want by tomorrow, I'll toss my .02 in.
((hugs)) good to have you back. :P
Reply
Reply
So yeah, something about buddists.
Reply
See- that's part of my argument. One of the dcitionary defintions of "pagan" is to be without god or religion. That is a biased and incorrect defintion. Toruble is, I can't find any short, dictionary-type statement to define "pagan" or paganism.
As for Buddhists- I don't consider them pagan, and I am fairly sure they don't consider themselves pagan, or even precisly athiest. I think some Buddhists do believe in gods, or a god... but it think varied by the type of Buddhism practiced and some other factors that I am not too clear on. (I think I may need to pay another visit to Nan Tien Temple again soon.) But I could be wrong, that happens to me a bit. ;-)
Who the heck is this guy who said that? He does indeed sound stabworthy. Good luck on not puncturing him tonight. ;-)
Reply
He's an arse that's who he is. He's the godfather to my beloved who seems to think it appropriate to waltz over here whenever he feels like it (he lives in spain most of the time) and make himself at home. He's a nightmare, and he turns my usually rational mother in law into a giggling school kid who encourages his juvenile and most usually offensive behaviour.
And he's here, again, being a gobshite. The red mist is soon to decend. I might go for a little walk.
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Great advice. I think you know the point I am driving at; that there is a very vocal hue & cry that goes up in many “pagan” quarters when the idea of Satan pops up. The lighter, fluffier subset of pagans often insist that Satanists cannot be pagans, “ooh those icky Satanists aren’t part of our happy united paganism!”. Well, some Satanists do indeed consider themselves pagan.
(Personally I am divided on the issue. I do see some forms of Satanism as being “pagan”, and some forms of it as distinctly Christian. This is one area I am going to have to address for the book, but not today. Maybe not today. Maybe I will make it a separate post. Yeah, maybe I should toss it out there, and collect opinions.)
But you are right; I may need to frame that statement differently.
"Pagan groups or traditions should adapt to your thoughts, beliefs, and practices when you join them, ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment