Listen to '
Neelayadakshi' (552KB, MP3) rendition by D K Pattammal and then
the same by Prasanna (544KB, MP3). The difference stands out clearly. Prasanna happily 'simplifies' the song and plays it fast (not really 'fast fast'... definitely way slower than U.shrinivas and definitely more clearer than U.Shrinivas but its still faster than DKP's
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
I would like to add one more thing for you to consider here. The performance you hear might not be the best by that musician. You have to take into account the situation, environment, audience, etc.
On an orthogonal note, I would like to point out that I have not listened much to DKP. I am a fan of the great DKJ.
Reply
That is true. Also the mode of presentation matters. Vocal is much more expressive and flexible than the Guitar. But the specific Guitar piece that I have put up was actually recorded in a studio. Maybe that also has an effect since many artists actually get pepped up after seeing a cheerful audience :)
Reply
It is not only the voice/expression/clarity/whatever that comprises music. It has lots of things more than all the above said which makes it divine.
I will just tell you something i felt in my music class today. A small 7 year old kid was singing 'Srirama Srirama. Sri manoharama' (sahana, tyagaraja). It is a very simple and beautiful krithi. The kid was unknowingly giving a cute gamakam in the 'manoharama' part.
I was wondering how the beauty of a simple ragam had been magnified by the shake of a swaram.
So, i would say that music is like coffee. Everything in a coffee - milk, sugar, coffee seeds make it more tasty and aromatic. But do we know what gives the milk its taste?
I think it was a bad example.. Anyways.. Hope you got the point.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment