A few weeks ago, I queried whether it was ethical/polite to argue with a Tumblr post on LJ. After hearing a resounding "It's kosher", I thought I'd take a stab. I had some rage at this
Original Post putting Willow in Slytherin and actually MEGA BLINDING RAGE at the tags below where xlivvielockex agreed and described why
(
Read more... )
Comments 26
Thank you.
And thank YOU for the essay here. You are by far my favorite writer of Willow meta.
Gabrielle
Reply
Reply
I've come to doubt whether Willow fits a Slytherin model for ambition. Because Willow really doesn't advance as far as she can on any level. Obviously, she rejects Ivy League prestige and Microsoft-like recruitment as a high schooler. Willow could be a lot richer, a lot more prestigious according to the world's measuring stick, and generally live a more comfortable, charming life. Willow rejected that because she wanted to fight evil and be a bad-ass Wicca.Like, I certainly would not argue that Willow is not ambitious? Nor would I have the faintest desire for that aspect of the character to change. But any conceivable course of action which prioritized looking out for #1 over fighting the good fight would've involved ditching the Hellmouth the first chance she got. Like, oh, I don't know, since she came up, Cordelia did. I like Cordelia and I 100% applaud her getting out of that ( ... )
Reply
Reply
I'm not sure Cordelia would do well in Hufflepuff? She values exclusivity too much for the come-one-come-all house, IMO. I don't know if she's more of a glory-seeker or a power-seeker, but she'd be good at either.
Wesley and Willow fit in all of the Houses.
Yeah, I mean, it's tricky because Sorting is meant to happen to kids, before they have the kind of life experience that spurs people to become more well-rounded and develop their less instinctive traits.
I could see Wesley as wanting very badly to be a Gryffindor, actually, though I don't know if he'd ultimately be happiest there.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
But still, as I argue in my essay, the dominant quality of Slytherin is ambitious and the secondary qualities are cunning and drive. I don't quite see Willow as ambitious (in a self-interested way) as I see her holding the primary qualities of the other Houses. I can argue that Willow's self-interested ambition. I think she's inarguably brave (Gryffindor), intelligent (Ravenclaw), and kind (Hufflepuff).
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Agreed on Willow v. Cordelia. Pro-Cordelia folks also like to bash Willow and Xander to act like Cordelia's bullying and verbal abuse was justified because (two of) her targets were just so terrible. If Cordelia's the noblest and most wonderful Champion that ever was, Willow must really suck because Cordelia just has to be right for publicly belittling Willow as boring or singling her out in the hallway or courtyard to insult her clothes or college acceptances or not caring if Willow died as a vampire or not apologizing for inadvertently putting her down as a big fat lezbo.
Reply
ahahahaha
Reply
I really agree with this. I think Harry slips into certain Slytherin modes of thinking from time to time also, but the thing that defines him is that he prefers Gryffindor values, not his set of inner impulses. We are our choices.
It took me a looooong time to realize that much of what's accepted as The Truth w/r/t Willow and Cordelia in fandom is a result of certain factions controlling the narrative because Cordelia is their favorite and they hate Willow for what happened with Xander cheating on Cordelia in S3 of BtVS. And they justify all their reactions to that as meta about the two girls, framed in moral terms. I mean, I don't think people necessarily consciously realize that this is influencing them, but...it is ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment