It's amazing how the NY Times, who decried the spreading of the Climatechange emails because they were obtained illegally, has no problem with the dissemination of the Wikileak cabals. Standards.
No mention of the redactions they coordinated with the State department? NYT is not punking the government, they're working with them to shape the impact of the leaks.
My problem isn't with the government or what it reveals, my problem is with the paper. They took a stand on one issue and then took a different stance on another similar issue. Honestly, i din't care if they publish the leaks, they are already out there. But they refused to publish similar "ill begotten" information earlier in the year. I disagree with their view that these instances require different sets of judgements and guidelines.
Comments 2
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment