Add notification on comments and entries published via Facebook Connect

Sep 01, 2010 18:46


Title
Add notification on comments and entries published via Facebook Connect

Short, concise description of the idea
When a user opts to publish their entry or comment via Facebook Connect/Twitter Connect, a small line of text is added at the end of the entry or comment, similar to what is currently shown on edited comments

Full description of the ( Read more... )

comment viewing, comments, external services: other sites, facebook twitter connect, § no status

Leave a comment

Comments 13

cahwyguy September 23 2010, 11:58:51 UTC
Note: You don't need notification of entries published, as publishing of an entry (viz a comment) is done by the owner of the journal. You would only need notification for comments, as those might be cross-posted by a non-journal-owner.

Reply

jessicala September 23 2010, 17:24:39 UTC
True. My thought there was that someone considering whether to comment on the crossposted entry might want to know that it had been linked off-site, in case that affected what they said or how they said it.

Reply

cahwyguy September 23 2010, 17:30:50 UTC
I'm not sure that's necessary, as the comment wouldn't automatically be crossposted (and if it was, it wouldn't be connected to the original post on FB).

Reply

azurelunatic September 23 2010, 17:24:44 UTC
Having a link on the entry to the location of any Facebook crosspost might be interesting for the readers, because sometimes those gather comments too. It could also be interesting for the entry owner, because Facebook's archival system sucks, to put it bluntly. If you want to see what discussion happened on a particular Facebook post, you can't just go look at a calendar, you have to hope you have a link to it handy, or try to find it by digging deeper and deeper in the past.

Reply


vvalkyri September 23 2010, 14:38:53 UTC
FB crossposting of comments to protected entries was disabled as per the last news post.

I would, however, still be interested in seeing that for public entries, as my mild preference is that this not be done. There's a suggestion that came out a couple days ago which would enable the journal owner to set whether crossposting of comments is available for that journal or any given post of it.

Reply

azurelunatic September 23 2010, 17:26:51 UTC
Disabled for most users. Those with the Cyrillic Services flag turned on can still do that. Though I imagine that after the scandal about the whole thing, that they'll have the discretion to at least not do it in public.

Reply

vvalkyri September 23 2010, 17:33:16 UTC
Y'know what drives me mad about FB? I can't /tell/ whether something is public, flock, friendsfriends, or what.

Reply

jessicala September 23 2010, 17:31:55 UTC
Yeah, there have been several changes since I submitted this that make the suggestion less interesting. In fact, if LJ does implement the idea of allowing a journal owner to control whether comments can be crossposted, this one probably isn't necessary.

Reply


mlady_rebecca September 23 2010, 23:11:56 UTC
I like this idea. I'd prefer to ban any X-posting altogether, but if that isn't happening, it's nice to know someone is taking the conversation elsewhere.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up