purging communities

Jul 31, 2010 15:42


Title
purging communities

Short, concise description of the idea
purging communities belonging to maintainer's whose account is suspended/deleted/purged

Full description of the idealivejournal has a tendency of sometimes suspending user accounts for seemingly no reason whatsoever and sometimes with that the user's community remain spacebound; never ( Read more... )

suspended accounts, account deletion, communities, inactive accounts, § no status, deleted accounts

Leave a comment

Comments 13

boredinsomniac September 23 2010, 09:31:31 UTC
I disagree. The community's remaining members would probably prefer to have maintainership transferred to one of them, rather than see the entire community deleted.

Reply

mmaster September 23 2010, 13:52:51 UTC
+1

Reply

charliemc September 23 2010, 15:53:50 UTC
+1

Reply

kayt_arminta September 23 2010, 21:12:15 UTC
+1

Reply


-1 just_chiara September 23 2010, 09:33:05 UTC
Sometimes communities, even when inactive, are still used as an archive. It would be different if it were communities without any entries, of course, just like never-updated user accounts.

Reply

Re: -1 charliemc September 23 2010, 15:54:20 UTC
Yes. Agreed!

Reply


azurelunatic September 23 2010, 09:38:15 UTC
Hmm.

If there are other members of the community, who are using the community, it does not seem as if the community should be deleted.

Even if the maintainer is gone, if the community has old entries that are still in any way relevant (fiction, humor, advice), it does not seem as if the community should be deleted, particularly if the entries are public.

If the community's only member is a suspended maintainer, and the community has no public entries, I see little problem with deleting the whole community -- that maintainer is not likely to be coming back, and there is nothing left for the public to view. In the event that the previous maintainer does come back under a new account (assuming they have not got the permaban) within a reasonable time limit, provision should be made for the community to be handed over to the previous maintainer's new account.

Reply

dawna September 23 2010, 11:35:17 UTC
I have no problem with the last scenario but only abuse can determine that and it can only be don on a case by case basis. It would have to be an internal policy decision.

Reply


dawna September 23 2010, 11:33:05 UTC
LiveJournal doesn't suspend accounts for "no reason whatsoever" there always is a reason, and the reason always comes from the Abuse Prevention Team or Ops (typically a traffic/DoS issue) and you aren't doing something wrong to get your account suspended.

That said, just because someone gets their account suspended by Abuse, doesnt mean an entire community should be suspended right along with it.

The members can ask for a new maintainer to be appointed by abuse http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=221

Reply


+1 tapho September 23 2010, 14:29:54 UTC
I just made a similar entry about this.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up