I'm curious to know what people not in a school of music think of this? Would you plunk down the price of a movie ticket to see Renee Fleming perform an opera at the met?
You should read her book. I think, even if one were not a singer, he could find it quite interesting.
Yesterday my teacher Delores and I were working on my recital program, and she showed me an example of Renee's program last time she was in DC. I replied 'psh, SHE's not reputable or anything.'
I've never been to an opera, so I can't speak from experience, but I've been to plays. I think you would lose something in the performance when you see it on the big screen rather than live.
Losing somethingsucilariaSeptember 7 2006, 23:42:30 UTC
You're quite right that something is lost. However, the percentage of people that can make it to New York to see a live opera is small, and the percentage of them that can afford to see one are fewer. This opens it up to a much larger audeince, and while not ideal, is certainly better than nothing!
Re: Losing somethingelena99September 11 2006, 01:42:30 UTC
I don't think anybody could argue that it isn't for the best that more people can see Met-quality opera. On the other hand, I think it's important not to confuse seeing an opera (i.e. on the screen) with seeing an opera (i.e. in person). The ubiquity of recorded/broadcast performance makes the "specialness" of live performance all the more important, I think. Just my two cents - and, if you read the comments on my weekly newmusicbox.org columns, you will quickly see how little my two cents are worth when it comes to discussing music.
Comments 6
Reply
Yesterday my teacher Delores and I were working on my recital program, and she showed me an example of Renee's program last time she was in DC. I replied 'psh, SHE's not reputable or anything.'
Reply
It could still be good, though.
Reply
Reply
Colin
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment