I just heard
a short interview on NPR's "Weekend Edition Saturday" about the continuing problems the Curia and hierarchy are having with the revelations of sexual abuse and cover-up. For once, at last, the person interviewed was clear, concise and sensible about the part of this that the media wants to talk about
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
I do have some trouble understanding clerical celibacy in a modern context, largely because my own life experience has shown no conflict between family life and religious vocation. But it's true that the ability to marry doesn't solve the problem; one of the congregations my dad was interim for had suddenly dismissed its pastor when several cases of past abuse of teenage boys had come out. I believe this pastor was single, but of course there was no rule saying he had to be.
Reply
The subject of requiring clerical celibacy or making it optional -- in the Eastern Orthodox or Episcopal/Anglican or another manner -- is certainly a wide-ranging and important discussion, with historical, theological and practical aspects.
However, I'm so very tired of celibacy being blamed for the cover-up and/or for the original crimes. The constant undertone is that continence itself is somehow inherently pathological, if not impossible.
Reply
In some ways, it's chicken or the egg, if you can pardon the use of a term that's not nearly serious enough for what it's referring to.
Reply
I meant to assert that clericalism has been the driver of the cover-up, and to express the tremendous relief I felt at hearing someone, at last, agree with something I find self-evident. (I am so pinchedly tired of being told that celibacy is the driver ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment