New Who 4.2, The Fires of Pompeii

Apr 12, 2008 20:30

Yes, that was an episode on top of its game, all right. I know it had some things in it that people are tired of by now - like the Doctor-as-Christ references in the white light spilling around him as he saves the Caecilius family, and the shot of him reaching out for Caecilius' hand like God and Adam on the Sistine Chapel ceiling. But even those ( Read more... )

four, classical receptions, pompeii, cult tv, reviews, one, religion, polytheism, ten, doctor who, douglas adams

Leave a comment

Comments 42

pickwick April 12 2008, 21:23:31 UTC
Excellent, I was waiting for this, and I'm glad there weren't any glaring errors or anachronisms that I missed.

Household gods always make me think of the Dalemark Quartet before the Romans. I really must read more history and less fantasy.

And seismic television indeed, ha!

Reply

strange_complex April 12 2008, 21:43:37 UTC
*boom-tish!*

Glad you enjoyed the write-up. I shall be popping over to read yours in a moment.

Reply


ingenious76 April 12 2008, 21:25:07 UTC
Fabulous review, and I loved the episode. If this gets more kids interested in Roman History beyond Gladiators, I'll be a very happy bunny.

Reply

strange_complex April 12 2008, 21:44:22 UTC
Thanks, and definitely! I shall be seeing if I can slip some references to it into my 'City in the Roman World' lectures this coming week.

Reply

ingenious76 April 12 2008, 21:55:40 UTC
Its unfortunate I finished teaching this module to my Sevens in January, but as soon as its out on DVD, I will be buying it and using it as a teaching resource. Kids like Doctor Who (well, the ones I teach!) and if it gets more of them interested, it can only be a good thing.

Reply


ixwin April 12 2008, 21:25:17 UTC
I presumed the reference to a thirteenth Sybilline book was deliberate - implying that this was some extra, secret, hidden book of prophecy that was distinct from the other 12.

Reply

ixwin April 12 2008, 21:32:29 UTC
Oh, hang on, reading the link it sounds like there were originally 9, not 12 so I see your point (serves me right for getting my knowledge via the version of the story in Douglas Adams' Last Chance to See)

Reply

strange_complex April 12 2008, 21:46:38 UTC
Ah, but thanks for drawing my attention to the fact that there's a popular version of the story in circulation which features twelve books instead of nine, nonetheless! Now I know that, I think you're absolutely right in saying that there were trying to imply it was an extra book, kept back by the Sibyl for her own purposes. Working from a basis of nine books as I was, though, it just didn't make sense!

Reply

ixwin April 12 2008, 21:55:28 UTC
There's a copy of Adams' version online here

Reply


owlfish April 12 2008, 21:27:33 UTC
The one time I noticed an oil lamp in use, it was being used by Caecilius over the glowing lavic fumes of the household vent.

Reply

strange_complex April 12 2008, 21:47:43 UTC
I don't think I even spotted that one! I shall be looking out for these things a bit more carefully on a second viewing.

Reply

owlfish April 12 2008, 22:10:16 UTC
It struck me because it seemed a really unnecessary moment to need additional lighting.

Reply

strange_complex April 12 2008, 22:12:13 UTC
Indeed!

Reply


qatsi April 12 2008, 21:49:38 UTC
Lucius Petrus Dextrus

Doh! I should have spotted that!

Reply

strange_complex April 12 2008, 22:17:00 UTC
Hey, that's what LJ is for. :-)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up