Uh. Wow.

Nov 07, 2009 12:39

Ever wondered what it would look like if Andrea Dworkin became a fangirl?

Wonder no more. I give you the LJ community kinkfreezone. Complete with a comprehensive lists of kinks that the mods will not allow.

I think ithiliana says it best when she points out that vanilla is a kink, too. To that I would add: whether any of these acts is considered a "kink" or not is ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 26

(The comment has been removed)

etana November 7 2009, 19:12:42 UTC
and.....holding hands in public, buying a house, kissing each other before leaving for work, the pope

Reply

starstealingirl November 7 2009, 19:18:01 UTC
*laugh* The pope? I think that might fit under "religious play" under the list of verboten kinks.

*is totally not fantasizing about sex with someone in religious regalia RIGHT NOW*

Reply

starstealingirl November 7 2009, 20:05:35 UTC
Thanks! Also, I loled at "buying curtains" and "happy endings."

Reply


plasticsturgeon November 7 2009, 18:33:16 UTC
Hey, Andrea Dworkin's been a punching bag too many times. Give Catherine McKinnon a chance... ;)

It seems like a really interesting challenge, actually...kind of like the Antioch rules. Actually the Antioch rules can be a kink--I'm surprised they're not on that list.

Wow, I'm amazed that EYE CONTACT is a kink. And floor pillows? Coffee cups? Eyeglasses? Tomboys? Puppy-pile cuddling? Nipples? Issues of respect? Sign language? (What, no deaf people are allowed to have sex?) Inexperienced partners?

Reply

starstealingirl November 13 2009, 01:31:31 UTC
*laugh* Well, I read Annie Sprinkle's essay about Catherine MacKinnon last week, and used her as an example when commenting to another friend's blog. I felt comfortable bringing it back to Dworkin.

Reply


werewolf_lib November 7 2009, 18:33:47 UTC
I have a feeling the most exciting thing about that community is the inevitable drama. Any time mods set themselves up as the absolute end-all be-all of Wrong and Right, things will become entertaining.

Reply

brighty18 November 7 2009, 19:36:16 UTC
How true!

Reply

starstealingirl November 13 2009, 01:36:37 UTC
Oh, it got interesting. The mod added a rant to her list of no-nos, in which she lambasted people for using their "tiny little minds" to... uh, point out that her list entailed a remarkable lack of imagination or openmindedness. Then she deleted the community.

Reply

werewolf_lib November 13 2009, 03:13:02 UTC
Super-Ultra Flounce (Now with More Deletion!) -- Available at your local internet!

Reply


plasticsturgeon November 7 2009, 18:36:11 UTC
An endless brigade of kissing, followed by stripping,

Stripping's not allowed, remember? Well, not if you're looking at each other. But you're also not allowed to do it in the dark because that would be lightplay. Maybe you have to just look in each other's eyes when you take your clothes off--whoops, eye contact isn't allowed either. Over each other's shoulders?

Reply

starstealingirl November 7 2009, 19:16:49 UTC
Maybe if one person takes their clothes off in the bathroom, and the other takes theirs off in the bedroom? Or would that be roomplay?

Reply


etana November 7 2009, 19:11:32 UTC
I wish I could link to your post. Amazingness. Interesting that you put vanilla as a kink in here - I hadn't thought about it but I totally fetishize cis-gendered penis-thrusting into cis-gendered vagina-toting bodies....I think it's one of the reasons I am attracted to cis-gendered guys, sad for them I have a very strict definition of sexing with them. Ha.
Poor dworkin-babies.

Reply

starstealingirl November 7 2009, 19:15:25 UTC
Post is now public; feel free to link. =)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up