Comments | stanleylieber: Son God

stanleylieber

Son God

Mar 04, 2006 05:09

( Read more... )

inri, stanleylieber, religion, itrecords, son_god, christianity, experimental, album, mp3, virtual_jesus, free, creative_commons, 1997

Comments 19

(The comment has been removed)

stanleylieber March 4 2006, 12:03:55 UTC

This has been sitting in a box for nine years, it will be here when you get back!

cap_scaleman March 4 2006, 13:56:17 UTC

Your earlier works have some kind of humour in them in my oppinion. Perhaps because you wheren't a pro with all kinds of gadgets back then.

stanleylieber March 4 2006, 20:04:15 UTC

I was hugely influenced by myself:

http://www.inri.net/zines/FUCK(tm)

Up until about 2003 I was doing all my music under the name 'INRI' or 'Virtual Jesus,' which is referenced on this album. It was a whole different trip.

cap_scaleman March 5 2006, 16:57:04 UTC

Looks like we really need a "Stanleylieber inerview part 2".

stanleylieber March 5 2006, 23:03:14 UTC

If you have stuff you want to ask me I'm game.

Thread 5

landruc March 4 2006, 15:08:51 UTC

What here could use excusing?

stanleylieber March 4 2006, 20:02:10 UTC

Well, it sounds like it's being listened to under water. I wrote those liner notes when first uploaded it to the Internet (circa 1999-2000), and I was a bit unnerved by how terrible all my tapes sounded, with regards to hiss, generation loss (from 4-track to 2-track stereo master) and general low fidelity. However, I like the songs. They even have lyrics! Some of which are embedded in the ID3 information of the MP3s...

nomorepolitics March 4 2006, 19:26:54 UTC

So you've grown more confident with all the positive feedback?

stanleylieber March 4 2006, 20:07:52 UTC

I'm not sure what zapped the initial upload of these tracks. By process of elimination it must have been the Creative Commons upload client. I followed the exact same steps (minus the Creative Commons upload client) and now the MP3s are accessible by everyone. This post is identical to the first one (now removed).

I don't know if I would say I've grown more confident. In some ways it's more difficult now to make music without considering how people are going to 'take' it. In the old days I had no listeners so that was never an issue. :)

Although I have to say it is kind of interesting to see what people think about this old stuff. At the time it was made no one I gave it to would even comment.

nomorepolitics March 4 2006, 20:22:11 UTC

I couldn't tell you what I think the problem was.

I have a bunch of special, rare, and i****** applications and codecs on my computers, which help bypass incompatibility problems. For the most part, I try not to use either microsoft or macintosh software, when I can get away with it.

This is great for the receiving end. But probably, if I was producing stuff for other people, they would have trouble playing it.

stanleylieber March 4 2006, 21:31:12 UTC

By the way, thanks for your comments on the other thread. It's great that someone has finally listened to this stuff.

(The comment has been removed)

stanleylieber March 4 2006, 22:12:42 UTC

Thanks. I sure wish I hadn't lost the lyrics to 3.