Harlequin Horizons is not a self-publisher

Nov 23, 2009 13:04


So Friday night my friend Jackie Kessler and I were invited to discuss the Harlequin Horizons situation on a podcast TV show. We readily agreed. I can’t speak for Jackie’s motives absolutely but knowing her as I do I assume they were the same as mine: to let people know that HWHo was a Bad Deal, that it is misleading, that it serves only to pour ( Read more... )

let's play nice, in which i open up in an afterschool spe, my opinion for what it's worth, i am serious, we should be in this together, i am sad

Leave a comment

Comments 2

david_bridger November 23 2009, 20:49:44 UTC
I'm sorry you got bait & switched. Yes, I think that's a reasonable assessment of what happened on the podcast the other night, although it didn't become clear until afterwards.

Thank you for talking good common sense. Thank you for sharing your knowledge and experience so generously and so often. And thank you for caring what happens to pre-published writers.

You, Stace, are a star.

Reply


ex_naomi_ja November 24 2009, 10:20:06 UTC
I find Mr Cochran's stance very surprising and disappointing, given his apparent knowledge and enthusiasm for self-publishing. Good on you and Jackie Kessler for speaking up so eloquently and knowledgeably!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up