The following is a mini-essay is a response to Ann Tara’s comments about John Sheppard’s background. I managed to lose it on my computer for about a month. This is the beginning of a continuing series of observations I will be posting. I will label all my essays and post them under cuts, so if you are not interested in reading ponderous
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
I agree, it's just not only wrong, but lazy and dumb. This has become the knee-jerk caricature that some fans automatically turn the lead into, like it's "Step One" out of some rote by-the-book bad fan-writing manual - especially those fans of the "other guy", not the lead, the science/academic guy. There are a myriad of reasons why they do that, none of them having anything to do with any genuine insight into the character, IMO. I find it to be a form of fannish homophobia in the slash community, because they always make queer the guy they don't like best - it's never the "other guy", the scientist or academic, even if and when that character at times displays more tendencies in that direction. That only makes those fans hit the lead ( ... )
Reply
Reply
I am posting here because this is more analysis than comment.
Choices is a fascinating story, thank you for writing it. Because of its ambiguous structural set-up the actions of all the characters are open to a wide range of interpretations which makes this story subtly different (I think) for each reader. In fact each time I read it my feelings toward it changed ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment