Mark Z. Danielewski's House of Leaves is a tour de force achievement in postmodern narrative deconstruction. While marketed as a horror novel, its true appeal comes from its multilayered story, which, Russian doll-style, compacts no fewer than five layers of narrative. [1] At the center is the story of Will Navidson, a Pulitzer Prize-winning
(
Read more... )
Comments 49
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
1
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX totally incandescent XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX freedom XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Guernica.2
2 This, and the following 4 pages of footnotes were scrawled over with black Sharpie.
Reply
1Did you catch your shout-out?
Reply
You need your brain to function before you can have fun.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
This is an awesome review.
Reply
And I'm pretty proud of this review, thanks. I had a lot of fun. It's been eight years; I'm sure I'm not the first person to do one like this. But...I still think mine is pretty awesome anyway.
Reply
Reply
b) I really hated this book. I found the third person description of the House completely sucked the life out of what might have been a good horror story. For one thing, the entire premise that someone made a film about this House, but then had other people analyze it - nominally a real event - as if it were just some piece of fiction absurd. It pushed me away rather than drawing me in. The typesetting, the endless footnotes, etc. just felt pretentious and annoying. I kept looking for something more, some point, and never found it.
Reply
b) See, I loved that. Because of course it was absurd. You didn't appreciate the satire? I mean, the media saturation this thing apparently had was just off the charts of sensibility. Yet, pretending it was real made me attempt to think it was real, how it would really work, which was fun. I do think it would have made a good horror story in and of itself, but I found this approach to it absolutely fascinating. I mean, I never would have thought that a description of a film I've never seen would be such a good read. (Unless it's a TWoP recap, right? Heh.) And I especially loved the way the typesetting mimicked the story, like with the labyrinth chapter: when that light bulb went off in my head, it was so cool. (And that chapter is stupid hilarious because the way he pulls it off is to fill up all the space with pointlessly long lists.) And then in scenes where text goes up and down and all around and gets compressed, it all helped me get into the scene and feel ( ... )
Reply
I guess, no? It was the kind of book where I could see someone who's had to read a lot literary analysis appreciating, but personally I just found it annoying. I know that some of the tricks were meant to pull people in, but I thought it was just dumb and ended up obscuring the actual story.
Reply
Like, for instance, an English major? ;-}
Reply
Leave a comment