please give me a million dollars and, oh yeah, huge pectoral muscles

Oct 12, 2009 10:23

I've gained 10 pounds over the summer which presents me with a dilemma. I've always promised myself that 175 lbs. was my cutoff weight, since somewhere around 165-170 is the top end of most BMI charts for my height of 5'10". I've always vowed that if I ever reached 175, I would begin taking steps to maintain and/or reduce it. Yesterday when I ( Read more... )

aging

Leave a comment

Comments 19

resonant October 12 2009, 14:26:34 UTC
This post requires naked pictures.

Reply

over_unity October 12 2009, 14:43:13 UTC
No, it doesn't.

It REALLY doesn't.

(no offense lin but seriously, it REALLY doesn't :P)

Reply

soopageek October 12 2009, 15:08:42 UTC
Actually I have considered doing a comparison photo of now, compared to a photo I took of myself shirtless after the accident almost two years ago showing off my bruises. In the old photo, you can clearly see my arms and shoulders as well a profile view of my belly, chest, and back - pre-flatbedding.

Maybe this week when getting a shower I'll take a new photo for shits'n giggles.

Reply

soopageek October 12 2009, 15:09:15 UTC
I said I'm meaty, not that I'm a piece of meat! Hmmmph!

Reply


democritus October 12 2009, 17:03:26 UTC
BMI is bullshit. It sounds like you're buff. If you don't feel fat don't sweat what the scale says.

Reply

soopageek October 12 2009, 18:05:54 UTC
I don't know if it's complete bullshit, as I explained to obscurek below, but I do think it needs to be considered with the proverbial grain of salt.

Sometimes I DO feel fat around the midsection, especially when bending or twisting my torso, but I'm not sure how much of that is because of my fat belly or because I have bulky lower back muscles in the way that I never had before. Not only is this the heaviest I've ever been but I have bonafide muscles fr the first time in my life all over my body. This is all new territory for me so I'm not sure how I'm supposed to feel.

Reply


obscurek October 12 2009, 17:18:14 UTC
The BMI chart always makes me wonder. It's so clearly wrong, that I wonder why it ever existed? It seems like the worst tool ever designed. I'm still super thin compared to most people I see in the world and it makes me mid to upper healthy. Was there a time when healthy people didn't have muscles? As soon as you put any on you go right out into the overweight range. Maybe it works better for women who try to get fit without bulking up? It juse seems such a strange concept that it caught on to the point where everyone knows about it, but it doesn't work at all realistically, and no one made up something better right away to replace it.

Reply

soopageek October 12 2009, 18:02:08 UTC
I think the BMI is meant to be a "starting point" for determining where you are in relation to an average, and that other factors must be considered when deciding what course of action, if any, to take. At least, that's the spirit with which I'm approaching it. Clearly it doesn't take into account significant gains in muscle mass which I attribute to my recent weight gain.

That said, it is true that if I lost the excess fat in my belly that I would fall back into an acceptable range on the chart, however, I feel that at this time in my life it's appropriate for me to have and the amount of work and lifestyle changes required to reduce/eliminate it greatly outpaces the minor benefits I would gain from it. I'm far from obese and I'm not a terribly vain man, so it's hard for me to justify the effort to do something about it.

Reply

democritus October 12 2009, 18:21:35 UTC
Body Mass Index was a concept invented in the 1800s by a statistician as a sociological tool and was only later adopted by the medical community in the 1980s because there was nothing better to use. As you've observed, it doesn't differentiate between fat and muscle weight so I consider it pretty useless. The news media sure loves it though, because they can claim huge obesity rates as "epidemic", etc. I'm not saying people aren't getting fatter, but it's hardly what mass media would have us believe. I've been "obese" according to that chart from my ripped, totally in shape military days to today (and granted I am kinda tubby but hardly obese) so i have a personal vendetta against it too. :P

Reply

rasa October 12 2009, 19:25:23 UTC
heehee, unless your frame has changed pretty majorly since I last saw you, it's pretty funny that you're mid to upper healthy, but I'm considered underweight! I'm definitely thin, but not underweight!

Reply


hxcpunkchick October 14 2009, 07:33:46 UTC
Is that chart really for both men and women?

Reply

soopageek October 14 2009, 11:52:43 UTC
Yes, and arguably one of the other factors to be considered when using the BMI: it makes no concessions for gender.

Reply


navygreen October 14 2009, 13:42:56 UTC
Hey, this is unrelated, but is this Fubu, by chance? An old pic, maybe?

Reply

soopageek October 14 2009, 19:17:34 UTC
No. Fubu doesn't have that much white on her neck. Also, I've never had a suicide knob in my truck. Also, Fubu would probably snap the steering column in two if she tried to flop her weight up there like that, heh.

However, that is definitely the dash/steering wheel of a big truck.

Reply

navygreen October 14 2009, 19:21:13 UTC
Heh, I figured you'd post it before submitting it to ICHC first, but then golly, it looked so similar to her, and the kitty looked just so comfy there in the big truck... where I know Fubu lived for a long time. :-)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up